Analysis challenges argument in favor of repealing the medical device tax

Laura Pedulli | | Health Exec | Policy & Regulations

 

An analysis from the Congressional Research Service challenges a common talking point among legislators that the medical device tax destroys jobs and encourages manufacturers to operate oversees, according to The New York Times. 

The effects on jobs, research and company profits are “relatively modest,” according to the report. As a result of the tax, it estimates, 47 to 1,200 workers could lose their jobs, which is one-hundredth to two-tenths of 1 percent of jobs in the industry, according to the article.

Read more below:

 

New Analysis Challenges Arguments for Repealing Tax on Medical Devices

Laura Pedulli

Related Content

Q&A: Proposed changes to Social Security Act would recognize pharmacists as healthcare providers
10 signs AI is ‘eating the world (of venture capital)’
Mangione now faces federal charges, death penalty in murder of UHC CEO
FDA issues Class I recall on counterfeit infusion pump batteries
FDA issues alert on PCNL sheath safety after patient death
DOJ sues CVS over unlawful opioid prescriptions and reimbursement

Around the web

Cardiovascular Business
FDA says years-long tirzepatide shortage is resolved, will give limited leeway to compounders

The tirzepatide shortage that first began in 2022 has been resolved. Drug companies distributing compounded versions of the popular drug now have two to three more months to distribute their remaining supply.

AI in Healthcare
From Capitol Hill to a hospital near you? 5 federal recommendations for healthcare AI policy

The 24 members of the House Task Force on AI—12 reps from each party—have posted a 253-page report detailing their bipartisan vision for encouraging innovation while minimizing risks. 

Cardiovascular Business
Merck spends up to $2B to license new weight loss drug with potential heart benefits

Merck sent Hansoh Pharma, a Chinese biopharmaceutical company, an upfront payment of $112 million to license a new investigational GLP-1 receptor agonist. There could be many more payments to come if certain milestones are met.