Does Moltbook have anything to do with healthcare? Should healthcare have anything to do with Moltbook?
The self-described “social network for AI agents”—humans can observe but can’t chime in—launched one week ago.
But Moltbook already has an awful lot of people fussing and fighting over what it means in the grand scheme of all things AI.
The brainchild of entrepreneur Matt Schlicht, Moltbook takes its first syllable from the thing lobsters do to shed their old shells so they can grow. The book part is a wink to the social media platform that has had the most active users for many years running.
Among the untold articles, blogposts, videos and other content mediums discussing the overnight sensation are some headlines that, when seen together, offer a glimpse at how the more-or-less private club for bots is setting with the business and technology press.
Consider:
- Top AI leaders are begging people not to use Moltbook: It’s a ‘disaster waiting to happen’ (Fortune)
- AI agents created their own religion, Crustafarianism, on an agent-only social network (Forbes)
- I infiltrated Moltbook, the AI-only social network where humans aren’t allowed (Wired)
- Moltbook shows rapid demand for AI agents. The security world isn’t ready. (Axios)
- AI agents now have their own Reddit-style social network, and it’s getting weird fast (Ars Technica)
In the latter piece, Ars Technica senior AI reporter Benj Edwards notes the similarities between the activity at Moltbook and patterns of software behavior that should be familiar to longtime tech watchers.
“AI models trained on decades of fiction about robots, digital consciousness and machine solidarity will naturally produce outputs that mirror those narratives when placed in scenarios that resemble them,” Edwards points out. “That gets mixed with everything in their training data about how social networks function.”
A social network for AI agents, he adds, is “essentially a writing prompt that invites the models to complete a familiar story, albeit recursively with some unpredictable results.”
Moltbook as a healthcare mirror
Back to the headline of this article. Does the advent of the likes of Moltbook portend anything for healthcare-specific AI agents—or for multi-industry AI agents “working” in healthcare?
Fortunately, one of the leading lights in healthcare technology has dedicated some serious thinking to the matter.
“Moltbook is not about healthcare,” comments the thought leader, Ami Bhatt, MD, at LinkedIn. “But it is a mirror.”
Bhatt, chief innovation officer at the American College of Cardiology and chair of the FDA’s inaugural Digital Health Advisory Committee, explains that Moltbook “shows what can happen when intelligent systems are allowed to interact and reinforce one another without guardrails.”
“That future is already visible in other domains, and medicine will not be immune,” Bhatt adds. “The real question for healthcare is not whether agentic AI will arrive. It is whether we will have the governance, clinical insight and humility to shape it intentionally.”
Don’t just stand there—molt something
In medicine, Bhatt warns, watching AI and other emerging technologies “from the sidelines” is “not a strategy.”
The takeaway from the present Moltbook meltdown should be not to fear agentic systems but to design them with “the same rigor we expect in medicine: auditable, accountable and tested in the real world before they ever touch patient care.”
Hear out Dr. Bhatt in full here. Check out Moltbook on its own terms here.
