Study: Immigrants are net contributors to Medicare, have lower expenditures than US-born population

With immigration certainly a central issue in the 2018 mid-term elections, a new study could fuel debates about the dollars and cents of policy proposals. Researchers from Harvard Medical School and Tufts University found that immigrants’ healthcare costs were significantly lower than those of individuals born in the United States.

The report, published Aug. 8 in the International Journal of Health Services, examined peer-reviewed studies about immigrant health expenditures in the U.S. that have been published since 2000.

“[S]lightly over half of all Americans (52%) currently believe that immigrants burden our country with excessive healthcare costs,” wrote the researchers, led by Lila Flavin, a fourth-year medical student at Tufts, and colleagues. “Two-thirds (67%) of the public believe that undocumented immigrants should not be eligible for social services provided by state and local governments.”

The team used a three-point screening process to select 16 studies from an original pool of 188. The researchers’ primary finding was that immigrants consume a disproportionately small percentage of healthcare costs. Accounting for 12 percent of the total population, those born outside the U.S. account for 8.6 percent of all healthcare expenditures.

Other notable findings included:

  • Undocumented immigrants are roughly 5 percent of the population, while only accounting for 1.4 percent of total U.S. expenditures.
  • Among immigrants with insurance, healthcare costs were 52 percent lower than American-born individuals.
  • Disparities in expenditures diminished among Latino immigrants who had been citizens for 10 years compared to white U.S. citizens.
  • Between 2000 and 2009, noncitizens spent an average of $500 on healthcare, while citizens spent roughly $2,500.

“Our review of the literature overwhelmingly showed that immigrants spend less on healthcare, including publicly funded health care, compared to their U.S.-born counterparts,” the authors wrote. “Moreover, immigrants contributed more towards Medicare than they withdrew; they are net contributors to Medicare’s trust fund.”

The study comes one day after the Trump administration is reportedly considering proposals to make it more difficult for legal immigrants to gain citizenship if they ever received insurance through the Affordable Care Act or the Children’s Health Insurance Program.

""
Nicholas Leider, Managing Editor

Nicholas joined TriMed in 2016 as the managing editor of the Chicago office. After receiving his master’s from Roosevelt University, he worked in various writing/editing roles for magazines ranging in topic from billiards to metallurgy. Currently on Chicago’s north side, Nicholas keeps busy by running, reading and talking to his two cats.

Around the web

Compensation for heart specialists continues to climb. What does this say about cardiology as a whole? Could private equity's rising influence bring about change? We spoke to MedAxiom CEO Jerry Blackwell, MD, MBA, a veteran cardiologist himself, to learn more.

The American College of Cardiology has shared its perspective on new CMS payment policies, highlighting revenue concerns while providing key details for cardiologists and other cardiology professionals. 

As debate simmers over how best to regulate AI, experts continue to offer guidance on where to start, how to proceed and what to emphasize. A new resource models its recommendations on what its authors call the “SETO Loop.”