‘Imaginative AI’ a strong diagnostic performer vs. doctors

Industry researchers in medical AI have demonstrated a “causal reasoning” algorithm whose diagnostic accuracy would place it among the top 25% of primary care doctors in the U.K. 

By comparison, a standard associative algorithm landed among the top 48% of the 44 physicians in the study cohort.

Associative algorithms use linear deductions to match symptoms with diseases likely to cause them. Causal reasoning AI—also known as counterfactual AI or “AI with imagination”—considers whether a different disease might be causing a given symptom or set of symptoms.

The researchers, three present or former executives with the London-based digital health company Babylon Health, describe the work in a study published by Nature Communications.  

In the study’s faceoffs on overall diagnostic accuracy, the physicians had a mean score of 71.4% vs. 72.5% for the older algorithm, which was created for the research.

Both were topped by the new causal algorithm, which scored 77.3%. This was higher than 32 of the doctors, equal to one and lower than 11.

Further, the new algorithm was especially impressive at diagnosing rare and very rare conditions.

“While we have focused on comparing our algorithms to doctors, future experiments could determine the effectiveness of these algorithms as clinical support systems—guiding doctors by providing a second opinion diagnosis,” the authors write in their discussion section. “Given that our algorithm appears to be complimentary to human doctors, performing better on vignettes that doctors struggle to diagnose, it is likely that the combined diagnosis of doctor and algorithm will be more accurate than either alone.”

In a news release, Babylon’s founder and CEO, Dr. Ali Parsa, places the achievement in the context of poor healthcare access prevalent in much of the world.  

The experimental algorithm’s success in the study “should not be sensationalized as machines replacing doctors, because what is truly encouraging here is for us to finally get tools that allow us to increase the reach and productivity of our existing healthcare systems,” Parsa says. “AI will be an important tool to help us all end the injustice in the uneven distribution of healthcare, and to make it more accessible and affordable for every person on Earth.”

The journal has posted the study in full for free.

Dave Pearson

Dave P. has worked in journalism, marketing and public relations for more than 30 years, frequently concentrating on hospitals, healthcare technology and Catholic communications. He has also specialized in fundraising communications, ghostwriting for CEOs of local, national and global charities, nonprofits and foundations.

Around the web

Compensation for heart specialists continues to climb. What does this say about cardiology as a whole? Could private equity's rising influence bring about change? We spoke to MedAxiom CEO Jerry Blackwell, MD, MBA, a veteran cardiologist himself, to learn more.

The American College of Cardiology has shared its perspective on new CMS payment policies, highlighting revenue concerns while providing key details for cardiologists and other cardiology professionals. 

As debate simmers over how best to regulate AI, experts continue to offer guidance on where to start, how to proceed and what to emphasize. A new resource models its recommendations on what its authors call the “SETO Loop.”