Watson rolls out toolset to streamline clinical study design

Healthcare AI giant IBM Watson Health has introduced software that can help medical researchers design clinical studies right the first time so as to minimize the need for tweaking and fine-tuning while their study is underway.

Called Study Advance, the cloud-based product allows users to access commercial and claims data from de-identified patient profiles covering 89 million lives from multiple employer-sponsored U.S. healthcare beneficiaries, according to a Feb. 18 announcement.

The software also offers tools for assessing the impact of inclusion and exclusion criteria on eligible patient populations.

In unveiling IBM Study Advance, the company cites an analysis showing around 80% of trials experience delays in recruiting and that 1 of 4 in-process amendments are “completely avoidable.”

Other research has shown that amending a single protocol in a Phase III clinical trial adds an average of $500,000 and 61 days to a trial’s timeline, IBM Watson Health notes.  

“Breakdowns in the clinical trial process, including issues caused by study design decisions, may potentially delay access to life-changing therapies for patients,” adds Rob DiCicco, PharmD, the company’s deputy chief health officer.

Dave Pearson

Dave P. has worked in journalism, marketing and public relations for more than 30 years, frequently concentrating on hospitals, healthcare technology and Catholic communications. He has also specialized in fundraising communications, ghostwriting for CEOs of local, national and global charities, nonprofits and foundations.

Around the web

The American College of Cardiology has sent a letter to HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. that outlines some of the organization’s central priorities and concerns. 

One product is being pulled from the market, and the other is receiving updated instructions for use.

If the Trump administration continues taking a laissez-faire stance toward AI—including AI used in healthcare—why not let the states go it alone on regulating the technology?