New AI model could help brain cancer patients avoid biopsies

Glioma patients typically need a biopsy so physicians can assess their isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation status and make a treatment decision. Researchers have developed a new AI algorithm, however, that could make such biopsies unnecessary; the model simply reads a series of MRI scans and makes its assessment.

According to the team’s research, published in Neuro-Oncology, its AI model achieved an accuracy of more than 97%. Could this make pretreatment surgeries for gliomas a thing of the past?

“Knowing a particular mutation status in gliomas is important in determining prognosis and treatment strategies,” co-author Joseph Maldjian, MD, chief of neuroradiology at UT Southwestern Medical Center’s O’Donnell Brain Institute in Dallas, said in a news release. “The ability to determine this status using just conventional imaging and AI is a great leap forward.”

Data from more than 200 brain cancer patients was used to train the deep learning algorithm, which can assess a patient’s IDH mutation status based on “only a single series of MR images.”

“The beauty of this new deep-learning model is its simplicity and high degree of accuracy,” Maldjian said. “We’ve removed additional pre-processing steps and created an ideal scenario for easily transitioning this into clinical care by using images that are routinely acquired.”

Looking ahead, the researchers hope their AI model can help lead to glioma treatments that do not involve a single surgery. For now, the next step involves testing the algorithm on much larger datasets.

Michael Walter
Michael Walter, Managing Editor

Michael has more than 18 years of experience as a professional writer and editor. He has written at length about cardiology, radiology, artificial intelligence and other key healthcare topics.

Around the web

The American College of Cardiology has sent a letter to HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. that outlines some of the organization’s central priorities and concerns. 

One product is being pulled from the market, and the other is receiving updated instructions for use.

If the Trump administration continues taking a laissez-faire stance toward AI—including AI used in healthcare—why not let the states go it alone on regulating the technology?