Mobile mammography attracts diverse populations, has lower rates of adherence

Mobile mammography, meant to reach women without access to cancer center visits, has become increasingly popular, but lacking evidence in comparing results to in-person clinic visits. In a study to be published in the American Journal of Roentgenology, researchers compared interactions with a mobile mammography van to in-person cancer center visits.

Social disparities often prevent women from receiving mammography, but the mobile van can bring care to the patient. This study evaluated the effectiveness of a mobile mammography van in terms of follow-up adherence, biopsies performed, cancer detection rate and sociodemographic variables. A total of 1,433 mobile examinations and 1,434 in-person exams were included in the comparison.

Results showed patients visiting the cancer center were significantly older than patients visiting the mobile van. The mobile van had higher rates of black or Hispanic patients and uninsured patients. In-person visits had a lower recall rate (13.3 percent) compared to the van (15.9 percent). Additionally, patients seen on the van were less likely to return for more scans.

"By identifying these characteristics, we can develop programs and materials that meet these populations' needs and behaviors, ultimately increasing mammography screening and follow-up rates among underserved populations," said researchers, led by Elizabeth Stanley of the Department of Radiology at the Medical University of South Carolina.

""
Cara Livernois, News Writer

Cara joined TriMed Media in 2016 and is currently a Senior Writer for Clinical Innovation & Technology. Originating from Detroit, Michigan, she holds a Bachelors in Health Communications from Grand Valley State University.

Around the web

Compensation for heart specialists continues to climb. What does this say about cardiology as a whole? Could private equity's rising influence bring about change? We spoke to MedAxiom CEO Jerry Blackwell, MD, MBA, a veteran cardiologist himself, to learn more.

The American College of Cardiology has shared its perspective on new CMS payment policies, highlighting revenue concerns while providing key details for cardiologists and other cardiology professionals. 

As debate simmers over how best to regulate AI, experts continue to offer guidance on where to start, how to proceed and what to emphasize. A new resource models its recommendations on what its authors call the “SETO Loop.”