Is lifestyle research even worth the effort?

Despite thousands of studies and millions of hours of research, it’s nearly impossible to know how humans should behave to maximize health when it comes to diet and exercise, according to the New York Times.

Because there's just so much information available, it’s hard to know what’s what. To make matters worse, many studies that focus on the effect of exercise and food when it comes to cancer, dementia or heart disease are difficult to replicate.

And that means the inkling of evidence that is available can’t be reliably confirmed. Which would be useful, because studies that rely on participants to remember behaviors from years ago or to self-report current behaviors are not fool-proof when it comes to facts.

Check out the New York Times to see how attention can often be bestowed on the wrong kind of research, why some studies seem to contradict each other—and whether or not any of it is worth studying at all.  

Caitlin Wilson,

Senior Writer

As a Senior Writer at TriMed Media Group, Caitlin covers breaking news across several facets of the healthcare industry for all of TriMed's brands.

Around the web

The American College of Cardiology has shared its perspective on new CMS payment policies, highlighting revenue concerns while providing key details for cardiologists and other cardiology professionals. 

As debate simmers over how best to regulate AI, experts continue to offer guidance on where to start, how to proceed and what to emphasize. A new resource models its recommendations on what its authors call the “SETO Loop.”

FDA Commissioner Robert Califf, MD, said the clinical community needs to combat health misinformation at a grassroots level. He warned that patients are immersed in a "sea of misinformation without a compass."

Trimed Popup
Trimed Popup