HIMSS: ICD-10 poses costly challenges

NEW ORLEANS—According to the Workgroup for Electronic Data Exchange (WEDI), ICD-10 is expected to be the most costly government-mandated change ever to hit the healthcare industry, Mike Hourigan, RN, senior practice manager at Cerner, told an audience March 4 at the Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society (HIMSS) annual conference.

After counting a few tentative hands in response to the question are you ready for ICD-10, Hourigan elucidated some of the challenges of the transition.

One case study of an ICD-10 implementation at Humber River Regional Hospital, a three-site, 605-bed healthcare system in Toronto, suggested that coding productivity dropped 50 percent in the year after transition to ICD-10. Although productivity rebounded, it remained 15 to 20 percent less than baseline one year after the transition.

Hourigan offered a bevy of reasons for the productivity drop. ICD-10 entails a new code set and coding rules, and coders’ knowledge of the requisite anatomy and physiology is lacking. An exacerbating issue is insufficient documentation by physicians and a shortage of qualified coders. Another blow to productivity is an increase in physician queries by coders, which not only cuts coders’ productivity but also is estimated to result in a 3 to 5 percent decrease in physicians’ productivity.

ICD-10 requires improvements in documentation and coding, said Hourigan, who outlined four Cerner tools to help providers navigate the transition to ICD-10. These are:

  • Diagnosis assistant, a wizard tool for physicians that helps guide users to the correct codes;
  • Document quality review, an inference engine that uses natural language processing technology to identify information that is likely to be queried back to the physician;
  • Care management, a chart review tool that searches for ways to bring more accurate information into the chart; and
  • Computer-assisted coding.

Hourigan suggested providers also begin planning for scheduling for future appointments after October 2014, educate physician offices about those changes and conduct multi-layered testing and training.

Around the web

The American College of Cardiology has sent a letter to HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. that outlines some of the organization’s central priorities and concerns. 

One product is being pulled from the market, and the other is receiving updated instructions for use.

If the Trump administration continues taking a laissez-faire stance toward AI—including AI used in healthcare—why not let the states go it alone on regulating the technology?