The uneven heart monitoring results of fitness trackers

Wearable devices that can track heart rates aren’t too far off in their results, but their accuracy goes down when people would need them the most.

"We have patients come in who have different kinds of monitors like these. Many of them are very concerned because they've recorded values that seem way outside of the normal range," Marc Gillinov, MD, a cardiac surgeon at the Cleveland Clinic told NPR.

Gillinov was the lead author of a study published in JAMA Cardiology which found wrist-worn fitness trackers became less accurate with more vigorous exercise. They weren’t off by muchApple Watch and Mio Alpha wristbands had about 91 percent accuracy, while FitBit Charge HR and Basis Peak were around 80 percent—but for cardiac patients or athletes who are closely monitoring their heart rates, that’s not good enough.

“For those groups, I'd recommend medical-quality chest-strap monitors," Gillinov said, though he added the devices aren’t dangerous, in his opinion, just not all that useful.

For more on why these wearable devices encounter the same accuracy problems as hospital equipment, click on the link below: 

""
John Gregory, Senior Writer

John joined TriMed in 2016, focusing on healthcare policy and regulation. After graduating from Columbia College Chicago, he worked at FM News Chicago and Rivet News Radio, and worked on the state government and politics beat for the Illinois Radio Network. Outside of work, you may find him adding to his never-ending graphic novel collection.

Around the web

Compensation for heart specialists continues to climb. What does this say about cardiology as a whole? Could private equity's rising influence bring about change? We spoke to MedAxiom CEO Jerry Blackwell, MD, MBA, a veteran cardiologist himself, to learn more.

The American College of Cardiology has shared its perspective on new CMS payment policies, highlighting revenue concerns while providing key details for cardiologists and other cardiology professionals. 

As debate simmers over how best to regulate AI, experts continue to offer guidance on where to start, how to proceed and what to emphasize. A new resource models its recommendations on what its authors call the “SETO Loop.”