Why ACA stabilization funds were kept out of the omnibus spending bill

The $1.3 trillion omnibus spending bill released on March 21 includes boosts in funding for HHS, the National Institutes of Health and efforts to fight opioid abuse. What was left out were measures aimed at stabilizing the Affordable Care Act (ACA) exchanges with funding for additional reinsurance and restoring the law’s cost-sharing reduction subsidies.

A vote on these measures had been promised by Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Kentucky, late last year. What kept them out of this spending bill—which Congress has to pass by Friday night to avoid another government shutdown—was a debate over abortions.

As the Washington Post explains, Republicans wanted to attach language referred to as the “Hyde amendment,” which prevents federal funding from being used on abortions. It’s been tacked onto appropriations bills for decades, but in this case, it would’ve prevented health plans which choose to cover abortions from getting any federal money. Democrats wanted to use the same policy as the ACA’s premium support subsidies where eligible customers pay an extra fee for plans which include abortion coverage.

Sen. Patty Murray, D-Washington, accused Republicans of rejecting “bipartisan work on healthcare in favor of partisan healthcare politics.” Republicans countered by arguing inclusion of the Hyde amendment was a “reasonable ask,” according to AshLee Strong, spokesman for House Speaker Paul Ryan, R-Wisconsin.

The spending bill may signal future moves by Republicans on changing ACA-related programs. A provision will require the Trump administration to publish information on the number of federal contractors and employees working on ““implementing, administering, enforcing, or otherwise carrying out” the ACA.

Read more at the link below:

""
John Gregory, Senior Writer

John joined TriMed in 2016, focusing on healthcare policy and regulation. After graduating from Columbia College Chicago, he worked at FM News Chicago and Rivet News Radio, and worked on the state government and politics beat for the Illinois Radio Network. Outside of work, you may find him adding to his never-ending graphic novel collection.

Around the web

The scheme took place over a period of at least seven years, resulting in Medicare being billed for more than $70 million in fraudulent claims for unnecessary scans. 

Compensation for heart specialists continues to climb. What does this say about cardiology as a whole? Could private equity's rising influence bring about change? We spoke to MedAxiom CEO Jerry Blackwell, MD, MBA, a veteran cardiologist himself, to learn more.

The American College of Cardiology has shared its perspective on new CMS payment policies, highlighting revenue concerns while providing key details for cardiologists and other cardiology professionals.