Hospital charges are driving higher payments

Hospital charges are on their way up, driving up private payments that are already significantly higher than public payments, according to a new study published in Health Affairs. However, the widening gap between private and public payments appears to be slowing down.

Hospital care accounts make up one-third of total U.S. healthcare spending, and previous research has shown that private payments were 66% higher than Medicare rates in 2013 and 50% higher in 2016. In fact, a previous study found the difference between private insurance rates and Medicare in hospitals jumped from under 10% in 2000 to 75% in 2012.

The latest study­­––by the same researcher Thomas Selden, director of the division of research and modeling from the Center for Financing, Access and Cost Trends at the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality––updates those findings through 2016.

Selden analyzed data from the nationally representative household survey from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, MEPS, and examined payments for nonmaternity events for adults 19 and older, including 48,388 inpatient stays, 85,873 ED visits and 236,516 outpatient visits.

Standardized rates during the study period (2012-2016) for all three visit types continued to increase, though widening of the private-public payment differences appeared to slow. Selden noted the gap may have peaked between 2010 and 2012.

“For all three event types, the peak ratio of private to Medicare payment rates occurred in 2012,” Selden wrote.

More importantly, however, was the fact that hospital charges overall grew much faster.

“Although payments for privately insured patients in general grew at a more rapid pace relative to those for Medicare over the study period, hospital charges for all payment types grew even faster,” Selden wrote.

The findings add to the body of works that already show private-public payment discrepancies, but also underscore how hospital charges are driving up payments all around.

“Although payment for most hospital patients is set through negotiation with private insurers or set administratively by public payers, tracking the rapid increases in charges remains highly relevant for the national debate over surprise billing and out-of-network care, as well as for public policy regarding bills faced by the uninsured and some third-party payers,” Selden wrote.

Amy Baxter

Amy joined TriMed Media as a Senior Writer for HealthExec after covering home care for three years. When not writing about all things healthcare, she fulfills her lifelong dream of becoming a pirate by sailing in regattas and enjoying rum. Fun fact: she sailed 333 miles across Lake Michigan in the Chicago Yacht Club "Race to Mackinac."

Around the web

Compensation for heart specialists continues to climb. What does this say about cardiology as a whole? Could private equity's rising influence bring about change? We spoke to MedAxiom CEO Jerry Blackwell, MD, MBA, a veteran cardiologist himself, to learn more.

The American College of Cardiology has shared its perspective on new CMS payment policies, highlighting revenue concerns while providing key details for cardiologists and other cardiology professionals. 

As debate simmers over how best to regulate AI, experts continue to offer guidance on where to start, how to proceed and what to emphasize. A new resource models its recommendations on what its authors call the “SETO Loop.”