UnitedHealth successfully sues CMS over disputed phone call

UnitedHealth Group has successfully sued the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) over its Medicare Advantage star ratings, with a federal judge ordering the agency to recalculate the ranking assigned to the insurer’s health plans.

The court’s decision means the 2025 star ratings for UnitedHealth’s Medicare Advantage plans are now vacated, as the judge agreed that CMS violated the Administrative Procedure Act of 1946 by not addressing a dispute over a single phone call.

The disputed call was made by CMS to UnitedHealth’s customer support for Medicare Advantage plans, with the agency reporting that the call was unsuccessful. A judge sided with UnitedHealth’s attorneys, who argued that it was unjust for CMS to factor this single, eight-minute call into their rating. 

Further, it was revealed that problems with the call may have stemmed from an error by CMS, not the insurer.

UnitedHealth initially filed a complaint with CMS in September, after this test call resulted in its Medicare Advantage customer service being rated four stars instead of five. After CMS refused to adjust its decision and defended its process, the insurer ultimately filed a lawsuit. Other insurers, including Centene, Elevance Health, Humana, and Blue Cross Blue Shield of Louisiana, are pursuing similar legal actions.

The ruling in favor of UnitedHealth could set a new precedent for Medicare Advantage star ratings going forward. While a single unsuccessful phone call once resulted in a lower rating that could cost an insurer millions, such outcomes may no longer be allowed.

The court ordered: “Defendants shall recalculate plaintiffs’ 2025 star ratings without consideration of the disputed call and shall immediately publish the recalculated star ratings in the Medicare Plan Finder.”

During the proceedings, it was revealed that CMS outsourced its test calls to a private third party. The judge ruled that the agency acted improperly by allowing contractors to ultimately determine a star rating for customer support.

The full decision can be found here.

Chad Van Alstin Health Imaging Health Exec

Chad is an award-winning writer and editor with over 15 years of experience working in media. He has a decade-long professional background in healthcare, working as a writer and in public relations.

Around the web

Compensation for heart specialists continues to climb. What does this say about cardiology as a whole? Could private equity's rising influence bring about change? We spoke to MedAxiom CEO Jerry Blackwell, MD, MBA, a veteran cardiologist himself, to learn more.

The American College of Cardiology has shared its perspective on new CMS payment policies, highlighting revenue concerns while providing key details for cardiologists and other cardiology professionals. 

As debate simmers over how best to regulate AI, experts continue to offer guidance on where to start, how to proceed and what to emphasize. A new resource models its recommendations on what its authors call the “SETO Loop.”