Only 18% of clinical recommendations are evidence-based

Advising patients on decision making with input based on evidence should be the minimum for primary care physicians. But according to a new BMJ study, only 18 percent of clinical recommendations are based on high-quality evidence.

The study used Essential Evidence, an online platform with evidence-based medical references, to compile 721 chapters of recommendations. Researchers then used the Strength of Recommendations Taxonomy (SORT) system to grade the recommendations as A, B or C. SORT A recommendations included consistent, high-quality evidence; SORT B included inconsistent or limited quality evidence; and SORT C included expert opinion or recommendations that rely on intermediate outcomes.

“This finding highlights the need for more research in primary care and family medicine,” said Mark Ebell, lead author on the study and professor of epidemiology at University of Georgia. “The research done in the primary care setting, which is where most outpatients are seen, is woefully underfunded and that's part of the reason why there's such a large number of recommendations that are not based on the highest level of evidence."

In total, 3,251 recommendations were analyzed. Findings included the following:

  • Overall, 18 percent of recommendations were graded A, 34 percent B and 49 percent were C.
  • Therapy was the most common A recommendations, diagnosis were least common.
  • Categories with the most A graded recommendations included pregnancy and childbirth, cardiovascular, and psychiatric care.
  • The A categories least mentioned covered information on hematological, musculoskeletal and rheumatological, and poisoning and toxicity.
  • 51 percent of recommendations were based on studies examining patient outcomes like morbidity, mortality, quality of life or symptom reduction.

“Filling in the gaps for evidence-based, patient-oriented primary care research should matter to patients as well as their health care providers,” said Ebell. "You would want your care to be guided by studies that have demonstrated that what the physician recommends will help you live better or longer. We should all want that kind of information to guide care."

""
Cara Livernois, News Writer

Cara joined TriMed Media in 2016 and is currently a Senior Writer for Clinical Innovation & Technology. Originating from Detroit, Michigan, she holds a Bachelors in Health Communications from Grand Valley State University.

Around the web

Compensation for heart specialists continues to climb. What does this say about cardiology as a whole? Could private equity's rising influence bring about change? We spoke to MedAxiom CEO Jerry Blackwell, MD, MBA, a veteran cardiologist himself, to learn more.

The American College of Cardiology has shared its perspective on new CMS payment policies, highlighting revenue concerns while providing key details for cardiologists and other cardiology professionals. 

As debate simmers over how best to regulate AI, experts continue to offer guidance on where to start, how to proceed and what to emphasize. A new resource models its recommendations on what its authors call the “SETO Loop.”