Healthcare AI today: Pittsburgh’s bonanza, Bay area’s superstars, Dr. Google’s followers, more

 

AI news you ought to know about: 

  • The numbers from Pittsburgh are staggering. And they’re all about blasting American-made AI into the stratosphere, if not to Infinity and beyond. Investments in the billions will be pouring in from at least 15 tech and energy companies and in the mere millions from five or six others. The pledgers are led by Google and the private equity firm Blackstone. Those two alone said they’re good for $50 billion—$25 billion apiece. All told, some $92B is set to pour into Western Pennsylvania, much of it to fuel energy production and infrastructure development. If those kinds of bucks flow in as promised—or rise to top $100B—Pittsburgh will become an AI hub of formidable power. (Bay area bigshots, eat your hearts out?) 
     
    • This sits well with the “special guest” of the event at which the plans were announced. “Today’s commitments are ensuring that the future is going to be designed, built and made right here in Pennsylvania and right here in Pittsburgh,” President Donald J. Trump said at the inaugural Pennsylvania Energy and Innovation Summit held July 15 at Carnegie Mellon University. “And I have to say, right here in the United States of America.”  
       
    • Meanwhile the summit organizer, Pennsylvania GOP Senator Dave McCormick—a Capitol Hill freshman—struck a note of bipartisan victory. Addressing the Keystone State’s Democratic Governor, Josh Shapiro, McCormick said, “We’re different parties and have plenty of differences, but on this we agree: We need to be at the crossroads of the energy and AI revolution.” He then wasted no time posting the investment commitments in writing. 
       
    • Environmentalists aren’t thrilled with the development, as the energy companies ponying up are mostly focused on fossil fuels. “This is exactly the wrong direction on energy at this critical time,” said Sandy Field, PhD, chair of the Climate Reality Project’s Susquehanna Valley chapter. “Pennsylvania has a chance to pivot right now and lead on the renewable energy transition that we need to fight the climate crisis. This meeting is just about planning more fracking projects and asking Pennsylvanians to sacrifice our health and the environment yet again.” Other leading environmental activists voiced similar concerns. 
       
    • Interior Secretary Doug Burgum shrugged off such apprehensions, suggesting they demand less urgency than other priorities. “I mean, really, this administration had identified early that there are two existential threats, and neither one of them is climate change,” Burgum said at the summit. “One is Iran getting a nuclear weapon. And then two is losing the AI arms race.”
       
  • Two Bay area metro centers are AI superstars. This means they excel in all three AI “success pillars”—talent, innovation and adoption. The neighbors and high performers are San Francisco and San Jose, and they’re alone among all U.S. cities making the superstar grade in the eyes of the D.C.-based Brookings Institution. Another 28 aren’t all that far behind, earning the title “star hubs” from Brookings for maintaining “uniformly strong AI ecosystems” and balancing top-tier talent with research and enterprise uptake. However, metro centers in lower echelons of advancement to this point are coming on strong of late. “[T]he recent boom in generative AI and agentic systems is beginning to widen the geography of AI activity to a broader set of emerging metro areas,” Brookings analysts comment. “To fully harness the power of AI, the U.S. should combine supportive national strategy with bottom-up economic development by regions.” It’s all in a detailed report released July 16, “Mapping the AI economy: Which regions are ready for the next technology leap?” After Pittsburgh and environs, we can now say. 
     
  • Close to 80% of American adults are likely to tug the virtual sleeve of Dr. Google when they feel symptomatic of illness or injury. Of those, 75% say AI-generated information is helpful “often” (31%) or at least “sometimes” (45%). The findings are from a survey of 1,600 individuals conducted in April by the Annenberg Public Policy Center at the University of Pennsylvania. Consumers’ growing reliance on AI deserves attention, the surveyors caution. “Although Google notes that its AI summaries may not be accurate, vast numbers of Americans are exposed to these answers and most consider them reliable,” Annenberg researchers comment. One emphasizes that AI platforms “are not necessarily updated in real time and may contain outdated information. Skepticism is warranted.” More findings here. 
     
  • The closer a hospital is to a city center, the more likely it is to use AI across all use cases. These include automating tasks, optimizing clinical work, predicting patient demand, predicting staffing needs and scheduling staff. The observation is only logical, especially given the preponderance of well-resourced academic medical centers in urban areas. Still, it’s interesting to see a granular breakdown of the stats. A researcher at the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis leads a tour through the data in a July 15 blog post. She compares AI uptake in metro areas with that in “metro-adjacent” (primarily suburban) and “not-metro-adjacent” (mainly rural) locales. Her focus is on geographic predictors of AI’s impact on workforce issues. “AI has the potential to impact the healthcare workforce by optimizing operations and potentially addressing worker shortages and gaps in access to care,” writes the researcher, Nicole Summers-Gabr. “However, not all hospitals may have the infrastructure in staffing and technology to implement these systems; this may especially be the case for hospitals in more rural communities.” 
     
  • Is your healthcare system really good at providing care—or great at using AI to charm you into thinking so? It’s getting harder to tell. And it’s not like a provider organization can’t be both a top clinical performer and a slick self-promoter. A contributing writer at Forbes explains why. “AI enables precision-level advertising by analyzing user behavior, demographics and intent signals to deliver targeted ads,” writes Lauren Parr, co-founder and product director of a healthcare reputation-management platform called RepuGen. “Marketers can deliver highly targeted messages to the right audience at the right moment while retargeting campaigns reengage patients who have shown interest but haven’t yet converted.” Read the whole thing.
     
  • The deeper the U.S. government dives into AI, the less secure we all are. At least it seems that way, what with all the calls we’re hearing of late for more and better cybersecurity. “With AI being embedded in so many of our tools and technologies, we are already finding that [federal] agencies are not able to really provide the additional protections for their data and our personally identifiable information,” Jennifer Franks, director of the Center for Enhanced Cybersecurity and acting director of the Analytics Foundry at the Government Accountability Office (GAO) said at a summit outside the nation’s capital July 10. “Going into the next phase of deploying and developing additional AI software tools and technologies, we’re finding more and more that federal agencies do not have the capabilities to really put us at the edge of where it is we need to go.” Gulp. Coverage of the summit by GovCIO Media is here. 
     
  • From AIin.Healthcare’s sibling outlets:
     

Subscribe to Health Exec News

Dave Pearson

Dave P. has worked in journalism, marketing and public relations for more than 30 years, frequently concentrating on hospitals, healthcare technology and Catholic communications. He has also specialized in fundraising communications, ghostwriting for CEOs of local, national and global charities, nonprofits and foundations.

Subscribe to Health Exec News

Subscribe to Health Exec News