Most organizations at or below their ICD-10 budget

Most healthcare organizations are at or below budget for the transition to ICD-10, according to the early results of an ICD-10 readiness survey conducted by consulting firm The Advisory Board Company.

Nearly 95 percent of healthcare organizations report they are keeping to their ICD-10 budget and 77 percent say they have comprehensive budgets with specific line-item allocations. The Advisory Board Company, however, notes that "with six months still to go in the process and many tests yet to run, budgets are likely to change with last-minute enhancements" and "while organizations agree on maintaining a strict budget, there's no consensus regarding how to transition across systems."

The chief financial officer is most likely (56 percent) to be responsible for the shift to ICD-10, followed by the vice president of finance (16 percent) and chief information officer (15 percent), according to the survey.

While organizational leadership responsibilities are well defined, other areas of ICD-10 planning and preparation remain undecided.

Most (95 percent) respondents plan to code charts using both ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes to prepare for the new system, but providers disagree on the percentage of charts to be dual coded and one-third say they don’t know. More than half (56 percent) of respondents say they have not renegotiated payer agreements to minimize risks associated with the transition.

"Most surprising, over 40 percent of respondents have not yet modeled the expected impact of the transition on accounts receivable (AR) days," The Advisory Board Company said in a release. "According to previous research, it will take months, not weeks, to restore AR to pre-ICD-10 levels, while spikes in discharged not final billed (DNFB) can significantly disrupt cash flow. This impact is compounded by the fact that 30 percent of organizations are not building up cash reserves to prepare for financial disruption."

 

Beth Walsh,

Editor

Editor Beth earned a bachelor’s degree in journalism and master’s in health communication. She has worked in hospital, academic and publishing settings over the past 20 years. Beth joined TriMed in 2005, as editor of CMIO and Clinical Innovation + Technology. When not covering all things related to health IT, she spends time with her husband and three children.

Around the web

Compensation for heart specialists continues to climb. What does this say about cardiology as a whole? Could private equity's rising influence bring about change? We spoke to MedAxiom CEO Jerry Blackwell, MD, MBA, a veteran cardiologist himself, to learn more.

The American College of Cardiology has shared its perspective on new CMS payment policies, highlighting revenue concerns while providing key details for cardiologists and other cardiology professionals. 

As debate simmers over how best to regulate AI, experts continue to offer guidance on where to start, how to proceed and what to emphasize. A new resource models its recommendations on what its authors call the “SETO Loop.”