HIV vaccine fails trial in South Africa

An experimental vaccine to prevent HIV has proven ineffective in preventing the virus, according to a study conducted by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), which is part of the National Institutes of Health (NIH).

An independent data and safety monitoring board reviewing the experimental vaccine found it did not prevent HIV. The study began in 2016 and has been taking place in South Africa, where an investigational prime-boost vaccine regimen was adapted.

“An HIV vaccine is essential to end the global pandemic, and we hoped this vaccine candidate would work. Regrettably, it does not,” NIAID Director Anthony S. Fauci, MD, said in a statement. “Research continues on other approaches to a safe and effective HIV vaccine, which I still believe can be achieved.”

The study, known as HVTN 702, enrolled 5,407 HIV-negative volunteers, consisting of sexually active men and women aged 18 to 35, at 14 sites across South Africa. The enrollees received either the HIV vaccine regimen or placebo injections, receiving six injections over 18 months. Participants were also offered access to oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), which has been shown to reduce the spread of HIV.

Researchers found 129 HV infections occurred among the vaccine recipients and 123 among the placebo recipients.

The findings were a disappointing result for a hopeful solution. South Africa has one of the highest HIV rates around the world, with more than 20% of adults 15-49 living with HIV. NIH is investigating several approaches to prevent HIV, including two other late-stage, multinational vaccine trials. Other AMP trials are also underway.

“The people of South Africa have made history by answering this important scientific question. Sadly, we wish the answer was different,” said HVTN 702 Protocol Chair Glenda Gray, MBBCH, FCPaed. “We will continue to explore promising avenues for preventing HIV with other vaccines and tools, both in South Africa and around the world.”

Amy Baxter

Amy joined TriMed Media as a Senior Writer for HealthExec after covering home care for three years. When not writing about all things healthcare, she fulfills her lifelong dream of becoming a pirate by sailing in regattas and enjoying rum. Fun fact: she sailed 333 miles across Lake Michigan in the Chicago Yacht Club "Race to Mackinac."

Around the web

Compensation for heart specialists continues to climb. What does this say about cardiology as a whole? Could private equity's rising influence bring about change? We spoke to MedAxiom CEO Jerry Blackwell, MD, MBA, a veteran cardiologist himself, to learn more.

The American College of Cardiology has shared its perspective on new CMS payment policies, highlighting revenue concerns while providing key details for cardiologists and other cardiology professionals. 

As debate simmers over how best to regulate AI, experts continue to offer guidance on where to start, how to proceed and what to emphasize. A new resource models its recommendations on what its authors call the “SETO Loop.”