Medicare Advantage savings aren’t adding up

While there is some back-and-forth debate over the true savings results from Medicare Advantage, the plans could actually cost Medicare and the American taxpayer.

That’s according to Hayden Rooke-Ley, a senior policy analyst at primary care company Aledade, and colleagues, who penned a blog post in Health Affairs this month discussing Medicare programs against taxpayer savings. According the Rooke-Ley et al., “when a beneficiary joins MA, Medicare spends more, on average, than it would have if the patient had remained in traditional Medicare,” they wrote.

However, when patients join accountable care organizations under the Medicare Shared Saving Program, Medicare costs fall, they argued.

Part of this may be because MA plans are given bonuses on top of their regular payments based on performance. Under other payment components, MA spending is between 2% and 5.5% higher than traditional Medicare, according to the authors. Those findings are also close to estimates from MedPAC, which found MA pay 1% to 2% more overall than traditional Medicare.

By comparison, MSSP has no quality bonuses, as ACOs can only share in savings. According to the authors, MSSP-enrolled beneficiaries have savings of $175 each.

The findings come at a time when MA enrollment has exploding, covering roughly one-third of all Medicare beneficiaries.

“Both programs hold the potential to yield better care at lower costs to Medicare, and as they continue to grow, policymakers should focus on providing beneficiaries with a fair choice: MA’s creative benefit designs and narrower networks or traditional Medicare’s open network that generates value through ACOs and other alternative payment models,” Rook-Ley et al. wrote.

With value in mind, the authors presented four solutions: changing the current benchmarking methodology, refining the MA risk adjustment methodology, improving the balance between rewards and penalties, and fixing the rural glitch that penalizes ACOs.

One of the authors of the post, Travis Broome, is on the board of the National Association of Accountable Care Organizations (NAACOs).

Amy Baxter

Amy joined TriMed Media as a Senior Writer for HealthExec after covering home care for three years. When not writing about all things healthcare, she fulfills her lifelong dream of becoming a pirate by sailing in regattas and enjoying rum. Fun fact: she sailed 333 miles across Lake Michigan in the Chicago Yacht Club "Race to Mackinac."

Around the web

Compensation for heart specialists continues to climb. What does this say about cardiology as a whole? Could private equity's rising influence bring about change? We spoke to MedAxiom CEO Jerry Blackwell, MD, MBA, a veteran cardiologist himself, to learn more.

The American College of Cardiology has shared its perspective on new CMS payment policies, highlighting revenue concerns while providing key details for cardiologists and other cardiology professionals. 

As debate simmers over how best to regulate AI, experts continue to offer guidance on where to start, how to proceed and what to emphasize. A new resource models its recommendations on what its authors call the “SETO Loop.”