Scientists express concern after gene-editing tool used on human embryo

Some scientists are showing concern after an experiment used a gene-editing tool to fix a potentially fatal heart condition in a human embryo, according to a report by the Wall Street Journal.

According to the report, scientists raised questions about a study that used the gene-editing tool CRISPR to fix a heart condition known as hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. The report also said the possible editing of embryos, sperm and eggs has “sparked controversy in part because any changes would not only alter that individual, but also be passed onto future generations.”

“Concerns stemming from last year’s paper included fears of unintended consequences on embryos and future generations, uncertainty about the emerging science, and whether scientists could prove CRISPR actually corrected the gene,” the report said.

The scientists who originally conducted the experiment defended themselves by saying they repaired the gene in the embryo by using a normal copy from its other parent and the faulty gene wouldn’t be inherited by future offspring, the report said.

Read more at the Wall Street Journal below:

""

Danielle covers Clinical Innovation & Technology as a senior news writer for TriMed Media. Previously, she worked as a news reporter in northeast Missouri and earned a journalism degree from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. She's also a huge fan of the Chicago Cubs, Bears and Bulls. 

Around the web

Compensation for heart specialists continues to climb. What does this say about cardiology as a whole? Could private equity's rising influence bring about change? We spoke to MedAxiom CEO Jerry Blackwell, MD, MBA, a veteran cardiologist himself, to learn more.

The American College of Cardiology has shared its perspective on new CMS payment policies, highlighting revenue concerns while providing key details for cardiologists and other cardiology professionals. 

As debate simmers over how best to regulate AI, experts continue to offer guidance on where to start, how to proceed and what to emphasize. A new resource models its recommendations on what its authors call the “SETO Loop.”