IBM Watson failing to delivering on cancer care promises

IBM’s artificial intelligence platform Watson was touted as a revolutionary tool for diagnosing and treating cancer. So far, Watson for Oncology has failed to deliver on those claims, struggling to learn about different types of cancer and only making recommendations based on training by its human operators, not its own insights.

Its shortcomings are profiled in an in-depth investigation published by STAT News, which interviewed dozens of people familiar with the system and examined its use and performance in hospitals around the world. What STAT found was, despite IBM’s claims that the “cognitive era” in healthcare has begun thanks to Watson, the system is struggling with the same issues of interoperability and data collection which dogs most health IT products. The hours spent feeding information into the system results in little payoff, with oncologists complaining it’s not directly helping in recommending treatments and isn’t providing any new insight.

“IBM ought to quit trying to cure cancer,” said Peter Greulich, a former IBM brand manager. “They turned the marketing engine loose without controlling how to build and construct a product.”

Read the full investigation at the link below:

""
John Gregory, Senior Writer

John joined TriMed in 2016, focusing on healthcare policy and regulation. After graduating from Columbia College Chicago, he worked at FM News Chicago and Rivet News Radio, and worked on the state government and politics beat for the Illinois Radio Network. Outside of work, you may find him adding to his never-ending graphic novel collection.

Around the web

Compensation for heart specialists continues to climb. What does this say about cardiology as a whole? Could private equity's rising influence bring about change? We spoke to MedAxiom CEO Jerry Blackwell, MD, MBA, a veteran cardiologist himself, to learn more.

The American College of Cardiology has shared its perspective on new CMS payment policies, highlighting revenue concerns while providing key details for cardiologists and other cardiology professionals. 

As debate simmers over how best to regulate AI, experts continue to offer guidance on where to start, how to proceed and what to emphasize. A new resource models its recommendations on what its authors call the “SETO Loop.”