Participation in clinical trials improves women's health outcomes

Research of women’s reproductive health—including areas such as contraception and abortion—is often underfunded and seen as risky. As a result, research from general medicine can influence how physicians care for pregnant patients, which is not an ideal approach to optimum medical care.

But a recent review of clinical trials shows that participants have improved health outcomes when compared to those not involved in trials.

A review of 21 studies including more than 20,000 women found a 25 percent improved rate of patient outcomes in women participating in obstetrics and gynecology clinical trial when compared to those not participating. These improved outcomes were seen regardless if a particular treatment was effective, leading researchers to hope these results will encourage women to join trials.

"Clinical trials are often perceived as 'experiments,' 'risky' or 'dangerous,'” said lead researcher Khalid Khan, professor at Queen Mary University of London. “However, our findings challenge these misconceptions. [They] show not only that [trials] are safe but that there is a significant benefit associated with participation, with overall 25 percent chance of better health outcomes. Interestingly, we also found that participants still experienced benefits irrespective of whether the treatment in the trial was found to be effective or not."

The study was published in BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology.

""
Cara Livernois, News Writer

Cara joined TriMed Media in 2016 and is currently a Senior Writer for Clinical Innovation & Technology. Originating from Detroit, Michigan, she holds a Bachelors in Health Communications from Grand Valley State University.

Around the web

Compensation for heart specialists continues to climb. What does this say about cardiology as a whole? Could private equity's rising influence bring about change? We spoke to MedAxiom CEO Jerry Blackwell, MD, MBA, a veteran cardiologist himself, to learn more.

The American College of Cardiology has shared its perspective on new CMS payment policies, highlighting revenue concerns while providing key details for cardiologists and other cardiology professionals. 

As debate simmers over how best to regulate AI, experts continue to offer guidance on where to start, how to proceed and what to emphasize. A new resource models its recommendations on what its authors call the “SETO Loop.”