Face-to-face evaluation, teleconcussion services in 100% agreement

Telemedicine is able to provide point-of-service care in medical emergencies. A recent study, published in Neurology, found telemedical concussion services and face-to-face evaluations agreed on diagnoses 100 percent of the time.

With many concussions occurring during athletic events, researchers tested the teleconcussion services on the sideline of college football games. Researchers tested each individual with the Standardized Assessment of Concussion (SAC), King-Devick test (K-D) and modified Balance Error Scoring System (mBESS) on 11 male college football athletes with suspected of having a concussion. Each assessment was done by a remote neurologist using two-way telemedicine while a sideline provider performed face-to-face evaluations.

Results found that both face-to-face evaluations and teleconcussion services agreed 100 percent of the time in diagnosing an athlete’s concussion.

"The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of teleconcussion for sideline concussion assessments," concluded Bert B. Vargas, MD, first author on the study, neurology researcher at Dallas-based University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center and colleagues. “These data suggest a high level of agreement between remote and face-to-face providers with regard to examination findings and [remove-from-play] determinations."

""
Cara Livernois, News Writer

Cara joined TriMed Media in 2016 and is currently a Senior Writer for Clinical Innovation & Technology. Originating from Detroit, Michigan, she holds a Bachelors in Health Communications from Grand Valley State University.

Around the web

Compensation for heart specialists continues to climb. What does this say about cardiology as a whole? Could private equity's rising influence bring about change? We spoke to MedAxiom CEO Jerry Blackwell, MD, MBA, a veteran cardiologist himself, to learn more.

The American College of Cardiology has shared its perspective on new CMS payment policies, highlighting revenue concerns while providing key details for cardiologists and other cardiology professionals. 

As debate simmers over how best to regulate AI, experts continue to offer guidance on where to start, how to proceed and what to emphasize. A new resource models its recommendations on what its authors call the “SETO Loop.”