Can computers identify lung cancer type, severity, survival rate?

Over the year’s computers have become faster and smarter, now being able to predict lung cancer in patients thanks to researchers from Stanford University School of Medicine.

Researchers used 2,186 images from the Cancer Genome Atlas to “teach” a computer to identify features pertaining to lung cancer by identifying 10,000 different traits, many more than the few hundred beings assessed by pathologists. The computer is able to examine cell's size and shape, the texture of the nucleus, and its spatial relationship to neighboring tumor cells. These identifying factors allow the computer to predict the type of lung cancer, its severity, patient survival times and differences between cancerous and healthy tissue.

"Pathology as it is practiced now is very subjective," said Michael Snyder, PhD, professor and chair of genetics. "Two highly skilled pathologists assessing the same slide will agree only about 60 percent of the time. This approach replaces this subjectivity with sophisticated, quantitative measurements that we feel are likely to improve patient outcomes."

The study only focused on the detection of lung cancer, though researchers are hopeful such programs may also be used to identify other types of cancer.

"Ultimately this technique will give us insight into the molecular mechanisms of cancer by connecting important pathological features with outcome data," said Snyder. "We launched this study because we wanted to begin marrying imaging to our 'omics' studies to better understand cancer processes at a molecular level. This brings cancer pathology into the 21st century and has the potential to be an awesome thing for patients and their clinicians."

""
Cara Livernois, News Writer

Cara joined TriMed Media in 2016 and is currently a Senior Writer for Clinical Innovation & Technology. Originating from Detroit, Michigan, she holds a Bachelors in Health Communications from Grand Valley State University.

Around the web

Compensation for heart specialists continues to climb. What does this say about cardiology as a whole? Could private equity's rising influence bring about change? We spoke to MedAxiom CEO Jerry Blackwell, MD, MBA, a veteran cardiologist himself, to learn more.

The American College of Cardiology has shared its perspective on new CMS payment policies, highlighting revenue concerns while providing key details for cardiologists and other cardiology professionals. 

As debate simmers over how best to regulate AI, experts continue to offer guidance on where to start, how to proceed and what to emphasize. A new resource models its recommendations on what its authors call the “SETO Loop.”