8 in 10 health apps have significant security vulnerabilities

More than 8 in 10 (84 percent) of U.S. FDA-approved health apps tested by IT security vendor Arxan Technologies did not adequately address at least two of the Open Web Application Security Project top 10 risks, according to the firm's 5th Annual State of Application Security Report. 

Most of the mobile health apps were susceptible to application code tampering and reverse-engineering--95 percent of the FDA-approved apps, and 100 percent of the apps formerly approved by the U.K.'s National Health Service, lacked binary protection, which could result in privacy violations, theft of personal health information and tampering.

Arxan discovered a wide disparity between consumer confidence in the level of security incorporated into mobile health apps and the degree to which organizations address known application vulnerabilities. While the majority of app users and app executives said they believe their apps to be secure, nearly all the apps Arxan assessed, including FDA-approved health apps, proved to be vulnerable to at least two of the top 10 serious security risks.

Arxan's research analyzed apps from the U.S., U.K., Germany and Japan.

“Mobile apps are often used by organizations to help keep customers ‘sticky,’ yet in the rush to bring new apps to market, organizations tend to overlook critical security measures that are proving crucial to consumer loyalty,” said Patrick Kehoe, Arxan's CMO. “Our research demonstrates that mobile app security is an important element in customer retention. Baking in robust mobile app security is not only a smart technology investment to keep the bad guys out, but also a smart business investment to help organizations differentiate from the competition and to achieve customer loyalty based on trust.”

Access the complete report.

Beth Walsh,

Editor

Editor Beth earned a bachelor’s degree in journalism and master’s in health communication. She has worked in hospital, academic and publishing settings over the past 20 years. Beth joined TriMed in 2005, as editor of CMIO and Clinical Innovation + Technology. When not covering all things related to health IT, she spends time with her husband and three children.

Around the web

Compensation for heart specialists continues to climb. What does this say about cardiology as a whole? Could private equity's rising influence bring about change? We spoke to MedAxiom CEO Jerry Blackwell, MD, MBA, a veteran cardiologist himself, to learn more.

The American College of Cardiology has shared its perspective on new CMS payment policies, highlighting revenue concerns while providing key details for cardiologists and other cardiology professionals. 

As debate simmers over how best to regulate AI, experts continue to offer guidance on where to start, how to proceed and what to emphasize. A new resource models its recommendations on what its authors call the “SETO Loop.”