J&J to pay doc $482M to settle patent suit

A federal judge from Texas has ordered Johnson & Johnson, and its subsidiary Cordis, to pay $482 million to radiologist Bruce Saffran, MD, after the jury found that the company infringed Saffran’s patent (No. 5,363,760)—Method and Apparatus for Managing Macromolecular Distribution.

The 12 jurors at the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas deliberated the case for two hours before making their final decision. The lawsuit, filed back in 2007, alleged that the Cordis Cypher drug-eluting stent (DES) infringed on Saffran’s cardiac stent patent.

In 2008, a federal court found Boston Scientific guilty of infringing the same patent and made the company pay $431.9 million. The jury had found that Boston Scientific’s Taxus DES infringed Saffran’s patent.

“We are gratified that a second jury has found that Dr. Saffran’s patent was valid and willfully infringed and that it constituted a significant medical advancement allowing the development of the drug-eluting cardiac stent, as recognized by the $482 million verdict,” said Paul R. Taskier, a senior partner at Dickstein Shapiro and Albritton law firm.

Around the web

The American College of Cardiology has shared its perspective on new CMS payment policies, highlighting revenue concerns while providing key details for cardiologists and other cardiology professionals. 

As debate simmers over how best to regulate AI, experts continue to offer guidance on where to start, how to proceed and what to emphasize. A new resource models its recommendations on what its authors call the “SETO Loop.”

FDA Commissioner Robert Califf, MD, said the clinical community needs to combat health misinformation at a grassroots level. He warned that patients are immersed in a "sea of misinformation without a compass."

Trimed Popup
Trimed Popup