CMS asks for feedback on MACRA’s version of meaningful use

Clinicians have another chance to influence how the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act (MACRA) measures meaningful use, as CMS will be taking suggestions on new measures through June 30.

The agency is looking for changes to what is now called Advancing Care Information (ACI) under the Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS). The category isn’t as important for 2017 after CMS allowed “pick your pace” options for the first MACRA year, but the current notice looks ahead to rulemaking for 2019.

In the notice, CMS lists three priorities for proposed measures under the ACI category:

  1. Build on the advanced use of certified EHR technology using 2015 Edition standards and certification criteria to increase health information exchange and continue improving program efficiency, effectiveness, and flexibility
  2. Measure patient outcomes and emphasize patient safety
  3. Support improvement activities and quality performance categories of MIPS

CMS also asks submissions to consider whether proposed measure would reduce administrative burden, duplicates existing objectives and is feasible to implement with existing or emerging functionality in health IT products.

Under current rules, once MACRA and MIPS are fully implemented, scores in the ACI category will make up 25 percent of a clinician’s overall performance score. 

""
John Gregory, Senior Writer

John joined TriMed in 2016, focusing on healthcare policy and regulation. After graduating from Columbia College Chicago, he worked at FM News Chicago and Rivet News Radio, and worked on the state government and politics beat for the Illinois Radio Network. Outside of work, you may find him adding to his never-ending graphic novel collection.

Around the web

Boston Scientific has announced another significant M&A deal, scooping up an Israeli medtech company focused on RDN technology. 

Harvard’s David A. Rosman, MD, MBA, explains how moving imaging outside of hospitals could save billions of dollars for U.S. healthcare.

The recall comes after approximately 3% of patients treated with the device during the early stages of its U.S. rollout experienced a stroke or transient ischemic attack following surgery. The expected stroke rate is closer to 1%, the FDA explained.