WEDI survey indicates slow ICD-10 progress

A new survey from the Workgroup for Electronic Data Interchange (WEDI) on IDC-10 preparations finds a disturbing lack of industry progress during the past year.

WEDI's February 2013 survey of 974 industry participants, comprising 87 vendors, 109 health plans and 778 providers, compared results with a much larger sample survey in February 2012 that posed the same questions.

Results show that nearly half of responding payers expect to begin external testing by the end of 2013, but a year earlier all surveyed plans expected to begin testing in 2013. Two-thirds of vendors plan to begin beta testing by the end of 2013, which is similar to the percentage that last year expected to start testing by the end of 2012. Half of responding providers in February 2013 did not know when they would complete an impact assessment and make business changes, or when they would start to test.

Other survey findings include the following:

  • One-sixth of responding vendors have started testing, and one-fifth expect to start in 2014, which is the same number that expected to start tests in 2013. One-fifth of vendors said their ICD-10 products were ready, the same number as last year. Top vendor barriers were customer readiness, competing priorities and other regulatory mandates.
  • Half of vendors indicated the delay in the compliance date until October 2014 resulted in delaying the timeline of major ICD-10 projects, but did not change resources assigned to the tasks. More than half of payers also reported delaying their timeline. One-third of providers delayed their timeline more than six months, but about 40 percent said there was no delay.
  • More than 40 percent of providers do not know the expected completion date of their ICD-10 impact assessment, or when they will complete business changes, both of which are roughly the same numbers as one year ago. About half of responding providers don’t know when they will start external testing, also about the same percentage as in 2012.
  • Asked how they will produce ICD-10 codes, a quarter of providers expect to choose the code directly, more than half will employ both crosswalking and direct coding, and less than one-sixth expect to just crosswalk from ICD-9 to ICD-10.
  • Staffing, budget, competing priorities, vendor readiness and the impact on information systems were the top obstacles for providers.
  • More than one-third of responding health plans in February 2012 were either complete or nearly complete with internal business process design and development, which showed significant progress from a year earlier when one-sixth had reached this stage and another one-sixth had not yet started.
  • Three-quarters of health plans expect to start internal testing “in the year before the compliance date,”--2013. Last year, slightly over half expected to test during 2012, which at the time of the survey was the last year before the then-compliance date of October 2013.
  • Health plans are split between those expecting to start external testing before 2014 and those who will start after the new year.
  • Competing internal priorities, staffing issues and other regulatory mandates were the top obstacles for plans.

WEDI sent its survey results to Health & Human Service Secretary Kathleen Sebelius, saying that health plans have made some progress toward ICD-10 since early 2012 but vendors and providers have not. “Provider readiness appears to be a major concern in meeting the 2014 compliance deadline. Unless more providers move quickly forward with their implementation efforts, there will be significant disruption on Oct. 1, 2014. Also, there will not be enough time to do proper end-to end-testing in the CMS suggested timeframes (starting Oct. 1, 2013), as the industry will not be ready for that step.”

 

Beth Walsh,

Editor

Editor Beth earned a bachelor’s degree in journalism and master’s in health communication. She has worked in hospital, academic and publishing settings over the past 20 years. Beth joined TriMed in 2005, as editor of CMIO and Clinical Innovation + Technology. When not covering all things related to health IT, she spends time with her husband and three children.

Around the web

The American College of Cardiology has shared its perspective on new CMS payment policies, highlighting revenue concerns while providing key details for cardiologists and other cardiology professionals. 

As debate simmers over how best to regulate AI, experts continue to offer guidance on where to start, how to proceed and what to emphasize. A new resource models its recommendations on what its authors call the “SETO Loop.”

FDA Commissioner Robert Califf, MD, said the clinical community needs to combat health misinformation at a grassroots level. He warned that patients are immersed in a "sea of misinformation without a compass."

Trimed Popup
Trimed Popup