Warren Buffett: Healthcare venture with Amazon, JPMorgan not aimed at small savings

In an interview on CNBC, billionaire Warren Buffett said the healthcare-focused venture formed by his Berkshire Hathaway along with Amazon and JPMorgan has greater aims than trimmed some healthcare costs or cutting out middlemen.

The venture’s announcement attracted plenty of attention in the stock market, but some financial analysts gave it a lukewarm response, citing both the complexity of the healthcare system and the chance the partnership was just another group purchasing organization to lower costs for the three companies’ employees.

Buffett, who has called healthcare costs “the hungry tapeworm” on the U.S. economy, said the goal is to deliver better care and take costs out of the system to at least halt the industry’s growing share of gross domestic product (GDP).

“It would be very easy I think to go in and shave off 3 or 4 percent just by negotiating power. We’re looking for something much bigger than that,” he said.

Buffett did reveal a few more details about the venture in the interview:

  • The venture’s first priority is to get the right CEO to lead it, a position Buffett predicted would be filled within the next year. He said the three partners “probably will” form a new healthcare company, but for now, it’s just a joint effort.
  • Buffet said there’s been a lot of interest from other companies wanting to join the initiative, but the venture is “not remotely there.”
  • When asked if the venture would buy General Electric or Siemens’s health care units, Buffett said “We wouldn’t buy a health care business to tie it in with the healthcare initiative.”

Buffett also wasn’t entirely critical of the current healthcare system in the interview. For one, he did say he believes the private sector is in a better situation than the government to fix its problems. He also said the industry is made up of “good people,” but it’s not cost conscious.

“The outstanding medical minds are functioning, in many cases, much more on the results, which they should be. But the cost really doesn't make much difference. It's very seldom that you read about some breakthrough on cost by anybody in this huge profession. So it's got a different set of incentives,” he said.

""
John Gregory, Senior Writer

John joined TriMed in 2016, focusing on healthcare policy and regulation. After graduating from Columbia College Chicago, he worked at FM News Chicago and Rivet News Radio, and worked on the state government and politics beat for the Illinois Radio Network. Outside of work, you may find him adding to his never-ending graphic novel collection.

Around the web

Cardiovascular devices are more likely to be in a Class I recall than any other device type. The FDA's approval process appears to be at least partially responsible, though the agency is working to make some serious changes. We spoke to a researcher who has been tracking these data for years to learn more. 

Updated compensation data includes good news for multiple subspecialties. The new report also examines private equity's impact on employment models and how much male cardiologists earn compared to females.

When drugs are on the FDA’s shortage list, outsourcing facilities can produce their own compounded versions. When the FDA removed tirzepatide from that list with no warning, it created a considerable amount of chaos both behind the scenes and in pharmacies all over the country. 

Trimed Popup
Trimed Popup