UDI final rule finally issued

More than a year after the proposed rule was issued, the FDA released the final rule establishing a unique device identification (UDI) system for tracking medical devices.

There are two main components of the UDI system created under FDA's final rule. The first is a unique identifier assigned by manufacturers to track devices' lot or batch number, expiration date and manufacturing date. The second component is a public, searchable database administered by FDAcalled the Global Unique Device Identification Databasethat will serve as a reference catalogue for all devices that have an identifier.

The FDA received 270 comments from 225 entities, including manufacturers, consumer groups, doctors and hospitals.

The final rule aims to:

  • Enable quick and efficient recall of medical devices;
  • Improve the accuracy and specificity of adverse event reports;
  • Provide a secure, global distribution chain to address counterfeiting and diversion; and
  • Offer a clear path for documenting device use in EHR systems and clinical information systems.

The rule also creates accreditation requirements for agencies that will issue UDI codes.

The final rule will take effect in about 90 days and will be implemented in phases over seven years at the cost of $86 million annually. Most high-risk medical devices will be required to carry a UDI on their label within the next year, while moderate-risk devices will have three years to implement UDIs. Many low-risk devices will have five years to implement UDIs or will be exempt from the rule's requirements altogether.

 

Beth Walsh,

Editor

Editor Beth earned a bachelor’s degree in journalism and master’s in health communication. She has worked in hospital, academic and publishing settings over the past 20 years. Beth joined TriMed in 2005, as editor of CMIO and Clinical Innovation + Technology. When not covering all things related to health IT, she spends time with her husband and three children.

Around the web

Compensation for heart specialists continues to climb. What does this say about cardiology as a whole? Could private equity's rising influence bring about change? We spoke to MedAxiom CEO Jerry Blackwell, MD, MBA, a veteran cardiologist himself, to learn more.

The American College of Cardiology has shared its perspective on new CMS payment policies, highlighting revenue concerns while providing key details for cardiologists and other cardiology professionals. 

As debate simmers over how best to regulate AI, experts continue to offer guidance on where to start, how to proceed and what to emphasize. A new resource models its recommendations on what its authors call the “SETO Loop.”