NYT editorial: Don’t kill the medical device tax

Laura Pedulli | | Health Exec | Policy & Regulations

The Congressional movement to eliminate the 2.3 percent medical device tax is misguided and may do more harm than good, according to an editorial in The New York Times.  

The elimination of the $29 billion raised from the tax could result in serious medical and financial harm for patients. “President Obama ought to veto any bill that eliminates the tax,” wrote the newspaper’s Editorial Board.

Read more below:

No Case for Killing the Medical Device Tax

Laura Pedulli

Related Content

Report: 44% of adults in the U.S. are uninsured or underinsured
Texas AG sues hospital for $10K after off-duty police barred from carrying guns
Cardiologists reflect on developing primary PCI in face of criticism and pushback
PBMs sue FTC for alleged Fifth Amendment violation
FDA issues Class I alert on Philips ventilators after 4 injuries
Trump selects Emmy-winning TV personality Dr. Oz to head CMS

Around the web

Cardiovascular Business
Q&A: MedAxiom CEO explores key trends in cardiologist, cardiovascular surgeon compensation

Compensation for heart specialists continues to climb. What does this say about cardiology as a whole? Could private equity's rising influence bring about change? We spoke to MedAxiom CEO Jerry Blackwell, MD, MBA, a veteran cardiologist himself, to learn more.

Cardiovascular Business
Payment cuts and beyond: Key takeaways for cardiologists from the 2025 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule

The American College of Cardiology has shared its perspective on new CMS payment policies, highlighting revenue concerns while providing key details for cardiologists and other cardiology professionals. 

AI in Healthcare
A modest proposal to rally AI regulators around a simple game plan

As debate simmers over how best to regulate AI, experts continue to offer guidance on where to start, how to proceed and what to emphasize. A new resource models its recommendations on what its authors call the “SETO Loop.”