FTC files suit to stop Illumina’s $7.1B takeover of life sciences firm

The Federal Trade Commission is suing Illumina, a gene sequencing firm, in an effort to stop its proposed $7.1 billion acquisition of life sciences firm Grail. 

The move highlights the recent efforts by the FTC to tamp down on healthcare consolidation after years of rapid mergers and acquisitions. In 2019, the agency vowed to analyze the impact of health systems and hospitals after a number of insurers made big deals across the healthcare space. The FTC also challenged Illumina’s planned acquisition of Pacific Biosciences of California in 2019.

Grail, based in California, is a maker of non-invasive, early detection cancer screening tests using DNA sequencing. Ilumina is the only company that provides the type of DNA sequencing that is viable for these multi-cancer early detection tests, which can test up to 50 cancers, according to the FTC. A merger between the companies would create a monopoly on the technology and “diminish innovation in the U.S. market” for this type of test, the agency alleged in its complaint. Grail is one of a few companies racing to develop liquid biopsy tests that can analyze patients’ DNA sequencing through blood samples or other fluid.

“The vast majority of cancers, which account for about 80[%] of cancer deaths, are only detected after patients exhibit symptoms. That is often too late to treat effectively,” said FTC Acting Chairwoman Rebecca Kelly Slaughter. “The MCED test is a game changer for cancer patients and their loved ones. If this acquisition is consummated, it would likely reduce innovation in this critical area of healthcare, diminish the quality of MCED tests, and make them more expensive.”

If the merger between Illumina and Grail were to move ahead, Illumina could raise prices on Grail’s competitors, impede the research and development efforts of Grail’s competitors, or refuse or delay licensing agreement with other MCED test developers. Already, these developers have no choice but to use Illumina for specific uses. 

The Commission voted 4-0 to seek a temporary restraining order on the deal, and a trial is scheduled to begin August 24, 2021.

Amy Baxter

Amy joined TriMed Media as a Senior Writer for HealthExec after covering home care for three years. When not writing about all things healthcare, she fulfills her lifelong dream of becoming a pirate by sailing in regattas and enjoying rum. Fun fact: she sailed 333 miles across Lake Michigan in the Chicago Yacht Club "Race to Mackinac."

Around the web

Compensation for heart specialists continues to climb. What does this say about cardiology as a whole? Could private equity's rising influence bring about change? We spoke to MedAxiom CEO Jerry Blackwell, MD, MBA, a veteran cardiologist himself, to learn more.

The American College of Cardiology has shared its perspective on new CMS payment policies, highlighting revenue concerns while providing key details for cardiologists and other cardiology professionals. 

As debate simmers over how best to regulate AI, experts continue to offer guidance on where to start, how to proceed and what to emphasize. A new resource models its recommendations on what its authors call the “SETO Loop.”