Federal appeals court: Hospitals can be both ‘urban’ and ‘rural’

Earlier this month, the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals declared that the HHS “reclassification rule” was invalid and hospitals could be considered “rural” in some circumstances and “urban” in others.

In the case of Lawrence + Memorial Hospital v. Burwell, et al, the court struck down the HHS regulation from 2000 that said hospitals could only be classified as “urban” if they cancelled their “rural” status altogether. In addition, the regulation said hospitals classified as “rural” had to wait a full 12-month cost reporting period before changing that classification to “urban.”

The distinction carries significant importance, because providers often get lower drug pricing if they can be officially classified as “rural.” At the same time, providers can acquire better employees and provide those employees with better benefits if they are considered “urban.”

Representatives from the Department of Justice have said they are reviewing the appeals court’s decision. 

Michael Walter
Michael Walter, Managing Editor

Michael has more than 18 years of experience as a professional writer and editor. He has written at length about cardiology, radiology, artificial intelligence and other key healthcare topics.

Around the web

The tirzepatide shortage that first began in 2022 has been resolved. Drug companies distributing compounded versions of the popular drug now have two to three more months to distribute their remaining supply.

The 24 members of the House Task Force on AI—12 reps from each party—have posted a 253-page report detailing their bipartisan vision for encouraging innovation while minimizing risks. 

Merck sent Hansoh Pharma, a Chinese biopharmaceutical company, an upfront payment of $112 million to license a new investigational GLP-1 receptor agonist. There could be many more payments to come if certain milestones are met.