When public figures act or speak differently than usual—or differently than anyone else around them—some people (and the media that cater to them) look for medical or mental-health related explanations. But the American Psychiatric Association (APA) has issued a reminder to its members: Don’t engage in such public analysis diagnostics when you don’t actually know the person in question.

According to NPR, the desire for such speculation has reached new levels this year, especially surrounding Donald Trump.

A statement on the organization’s website said, “The unique atmosphere of this year's election cycle may lead some to want to psychoanalyze the candidates, but to do so would not only be unethical, it would be irresponsible.”

But, NPR reports, some people still want the (responsible) professional opinion of mental health experts when public figures seem to truly get out of hand. Check out NPR to see why some people are saying those opinions could be an important tool for voters, despite the APA’s warnings: