Understaffing, outdated technology plague Native American hospitals

Substandard care at hospitals operated by the Indian Health Service (IHS) isn’t a new issue, but a new report offered some specific reasons why the facilities have such severe deficiencies.

The regional offices of the IHS, which runs 28 hospitals providing service to Native American tribes, have to root out quality problems based on a small amount of complaints and patient harm reports, according to a report from HHS’s Office of the Inspector General (OIG).

“According to hospital administrators, most patient complaints relate to customer service and wait times, rather than medical care. Further, most hospitals (20 of 28) receive fewer than 100 complaints per year for inpatient and outpatient visits combined, averaging about one complaint per 1,000 patient visits,” the OIG report said. “Considering the quantity and subject matter of complaints and patient harm reports, they are unlikely to provide hospital staff with the breadth of information needed to identify and diagnose systemic quality or compliance breakdowns."

The regional offices make it worse, the report said, by not inspecting facilities often enough. This has led to significant quality issues going unaddressed—15 of the 28 hospitals reported care being affected thanks to inadequate physical conditions, including one hospital where sewage leaked into an operating room.

Increasing scrutiny of IHS hospitals has led to efforts to improve care in recent months, like expanding access to telemedicine services and CMS awarding a contract for a quality improvement initiative at those facilities.

Those efforts could be hampered by continuing problems with staff at IHS hospitals. At the time the information for the reports was collected, the facilities had a 33 percent physician vacancy rate, and attracting and retaining skilled employees were constant challenges.

“The dependence on 'acting' personnel and contracted providers to fill vacancies sometimes creates instability in IHS hospitals and weakens the continuity of care provided to patients,” OIG said in its report.

IHS and CMS concurred with all the findings of the report and promised to adopt its recommendations for more frequent inspections and simplifying the employee application process.

""
John Gregory, Senior Writer

John joined TriMed in 2016, focusing on healthcare policy and regulation. After graduating from Columbia College Chicago, he worked at FM News Chicago and Rivet News Radio, and worked on the state government and politics beat for the Illinois Radio Network. Outside of work, you may find him adding to his never-ending graphic novel collection.

Around the web

Compensation for heart specialists continues to climb. What does this say about cardiology as a whole? Could private equity's rising influence bring about change? We spoke to MedAxiom CEO Jerry Blackwell, MD, MBA, a veteran cardiologist himself, to learn more.

The American College of Cardiology has shared its perspective on new CMS payment policies, highlighting revenue concerns while providing key details for cardiologists and other cardiology professionals. 

As debate simmers over how best to regulate AI, experts continue to offer guidance on where to start, how to proceed and what to emphasize. A new resource models its recommendations on what its authors call the “SETO Loop.”