Hospitals rethinking approach to medical errors

Instead of the “deny-and-defend” strategy typically employed when a medical procedure goes wrong, more hospitals and physicians are getting used to the idea of a more open, honest discussion about adverse events.

Zhai Yun Tan of Kaiser Health News writes about the experience of Maryland hospital chain MedStar Health in training physicians to talk about adverse events with patients and family members. A team of doctors completed a four-hour training course followed by booster courses every six to eight months. Part of the training included simulated patient scenarios with professional actors.

“It’s scary to be in that room even though I knew it was a simulation,” said MedStar intensive care physician Sharon O’Brien, MD.

For more on MedStar’s program, and how similar training is being implemented at medical schools, click on the link below:  

""
John Gregory, Senior Writer

John joined TriMed in 2016, focusing on healthcare policy and regulation. After graduating from Columbia College Chicago, he worked at FM News Chicago and Rivet News Radio, and worked on the state government and politics beat for the Illinois Radio Network. Outside of work, you may find him adding to his never-ending graphic novel collection.

Around the web

The American College of Cardiology has shared its perspective on new CMS payment policies, highlighting revenue concerns while providing key details for cardiologists and other cardiology professionals. 

As debate simmers over how best to regulate AI, experts continue to offer guidance on where to start, how to proceed and what to emphasize. A new resource models its recommendations on what its authors call the “SETO Loop.”

FDA Commissioner Robert Califf, MD, said the clinical community needs to combat health misinformation at a grassroots level. He warned that patients are immersed in a "sea of misinformation without a compass."

Trimed Popup
Trimed Popup