USPSTF now recommends screening all adults for anxiety disorders

The United State Preventive Services Task Force released a new recommendation statement pertaining to screening individuals for anxiety disorders. 

The task force is now recommending that all adults between the ages of 19 and 64, including pregnant and postpartum women, undergo screening for anxiety disorders, even in the absence of a history of mental health disorders and/or signs and symptoms of such conditions.  

Justifying their recommendation, the task force noted that anxiety disorders often go undetected in primary care settings, which can result in years-long delays in treatment. The task force determined that there is adequate evidence to support the notion that screening tools can appropriately identify these disorders in an adult population; there also is ample evidence on the benefits of psychological interventions and pharmacotherapy in reducing associated symptoms, the USPSTF summary noted. 

“To achieve the benefit of screening for anxiety disorders and reduce disparities in anxiety disorder-associated morbidity, it is important that persons who screen positive are evaluated further for diagnosis and, if appropriate, are provided or referred for evidence-based care,” the USPSTF summary reads. 

This is the first time that the task force has recommended screening for anxiety disorders in an asymptomatic adult population. The new recommendation follows a systemic review commissioned by USPTF to assess the benefits versus harms of these screenings. 

Multiple studies and clinical trials were included in the review, as was ample data on conditions such as generalized anxiety disorder, social anxiety disorder, panic disorder and anxiety not otherwise specified.  

The recommendation does not advise on screening intervals, however, as there is insufficient evidence on optimal timing of such assessments. In the absence of this evidence, USPSTF suggested that a pragmatic approach “might include screening all adults who have not been screened previously and using clinical judgment in considering risk factors, comorbid conditions, and life events to determine if additional screening of high-risk patients is warranted.” 

The full recommendation can be viewed here

Hannah murhphy headshot

In addition to her background in journalism, Hannah also has patient-facing experience in clinical settings, having spent more than 12 years working as a registered rad tech. She joined Innovate Healthcare in 2021 and has since put her unique expertise to use in her editorial role with Health Imaging.

Around the web

Compensation for heart specialists continues to climb. What does this say about cardiology as a whole? Could private equity's rising influence bring about change? We spoke to MedAxiom CEO Jerry Blackwell, MD, MBA, a veteran cardiologist himself, to learn more.

The American College of Cardiology has shared its perspective on new CMS payment policies, highlighting revenue concerns while providing key details for cardiologists and other cardiology professionals. 

As debate simmers over how best to regulate AI, experts continue to offer guidance on where to start, how to proceed and what to emphasize. A new resource models its recommendations on what its authors call the “SETO Loop.”