Report: Consumers in dark on physician quality data

Independent and objective data on physician performance are only available for 15 percent of doctors in the U.S., according to a recent report from the non-profit Health Care Incentives Improvement Institute (HCI3).

In its state report card on transparency of physician quality information, only Minnesota and Washington received an A. Maine and California each received a B, while Massachusetts and Wisconsin both earned a C. The rest didn’t perform so well; Missouri, New Mexico, Ohio and Oregon received Ds while the remaining 40 states, plus the District of Columbia, all received failing marks, according to the report.

“Consumers are flying blind when it comes to selecting hospitals and physicians, and the overall quality and affordability of American healthcare won’t be improved until we find a way to solve this problem,” said Francois de Brantes, HCI3 executive director, in a statement. “While the 2014 report shows an improvement in grades in a few states, overall the lack of information to make informed choices is disappointing.”

Read the report

Around the web

The American College of Cardiology has shared its perspective on new CMS payment policies, highlighting revenue concerns while providing key details for cardiologists and other cardiology professionals. 

As debate simmers over how best to regulate AI, experts continue to offer guidance on where to start, how to proceed and what to emphasize. A new resource models its recommendations on what its authors call the “SETO Loop.”

FDA Commissioner Robert Califf, MD, said the clinical community needs to combat health misinformation at a grassroots level. He warned that patients are immersed in a "sea of misinformation without a compass."

Trimed Popup
Trimed Popup