Healthcare consolidation isn’t driven by ACO participation

While the consolidation trend across healthcare accelerated after the Affordable Care Act (ACA) was passed, there's little evidence connecting consolidation to providers wanting to succeed under accountable care organization (ACO) programs created after the ACA, according to a study published in the February issue of Health Affairs.

Harvard University PhD candidate Hannah Nephrash and her coauthors said there was “widespread concern” the expansion of these new payment models would lead to greater consolidation, with the assumption being larger organizations can bear more risk in ACO contracts. The study argued empirical evidence to back up these worries does not exist.

It offered two complementary analyses: 1) comparing consolidation over time between markets with more ACO contracting in 2014 versus less, and 2) within markets between ACO-contracting physicians and those not participating in an ACO. Nephrash and her coauthors examined a variety of data, including Medicare claims, publicly-announced data on hospital mergers and acquisitions of physician practices, and American Hospital Association surveys from 2008 to 2015.

The results confirmed physician groups and hospital systems got larger after the ACA was signed into law. That consolidation trend, however, wasn’t driven by a desire to take on more financial risk in ACO contracts.

“Markets with greater 2014 ACO participation did not experience differential changes in physician-hospital integration, physician group size, physician market concentration, hospital market concentration or, importantly, commercial health care prices from 2008 to 2013,” Nephrash and her coauthors wrote.

There was some evidence, however, of defensive consolidation.  The study found an overall increase in post-ACA hospital mergers without changes in hospital market concentration related to ACO penetration, and “a significant inverse relationship” between pre-ACA hospital market concentration and post-ACA penetration of ACOs. This means practices and hospitals may have consolidated to avoid entering into risk contracts, not to succeed in them.

“Hospitals and specialists in particular might consolidate to rebuff payer pressure to enter risk contracts or to attain sufficient market share to ensure continued referrals from ACOs that might otherwise steer patients to more efficient providers,” Nephrash and her coauthors wrote.

""
John Gregory, Senior Writer

John joined TriMed in 2016, focusing on healthcare policy and regulation. After graduating from Columbia College Chicago, he worked at FM News Chicago and Rivet News Radio, and worked on the state government and politics beat for the Illinois Radio Network. Outside of work, you may find him adding to his never-ending graphic novel collection.

Around the web

Compensation for heart specialists continues to climb. What does this say about cardiology as a whole? Could private equity's rising influence bring about change? We spoke to MedAxiom CEO Jerry Blackwell, MD, MBA, a veteran cardiologist himself, to learn more.

The American College of Cardiology has shared its perspective on new CMS payment policies, highlighting revenue concerns while providing key details for cardiologists and other cardiology professionals. 

As debate simmers over how best to regulate AI, experts continue to offer guidance on where to start, how to proceed and what to emphasize. A new resource models its recommendations on what its authors call the “SETO Loop.”