HCLF: 'EHRs must become smarter'

CHICAGO—Personalized medicine may bring clinicians at odds with evidence-based medicine, said Howard C. Bauchner, MD, editor-in-chief of the Journal of the American Medical Association, speaking at the Healthcare Leadership Forum. Healthcare is working on “reconciling patient preference with evidence-based medicine,” he said.

Meanwhile, $25 billion is spent on IT in U.S. hospitals and “there has been a tremendous surge in the use of EMRs. Up to 70 percent of providers engage patients with EHRs. How rich and integrated those EHRs are is uncertain.” Interoperability remains a challenge, he said, but there is a great deal of interest in improving connectivity. The cognitive capacity of EHRs remain limited and Bauchner said he has "a sense they will stay siloed for many years to come.”

JAMA has a long association with evidence-based medicine, Bauchner said, publishing a 1992 seminal paper defining evidence-based medicine. The publication gets about 5,000 reports a year and the editorial team discusses 1,800 of those. “We read so many papers which provides an enormous landscape and special look at American medicine.” Evidence-based medicine has experienced substantial improvements, he said, such as incorporating systematic reviews into guidelines. “We’re just beginning to see the next evolution of guidelines and grading of evidence but “we still struggle in how to take that summary variable and understand how to articulate what that would mean from a clinical standpoint.”

Bauchner said he thinks health IT can help incorporate level A evidence into EHRs. The question, he said, when considering safety, quality, variation, etc., is “how can we create a horizontal view of these issues so there can be progress in health outcomes? The key will be health IT.”

Health IT plus guidelines equals value, he said. “EHRs must become smarter. We have to go beyond counting and linking databases.” He said big data makes him nervous. “I’m not sure anyone knows where we’re going.” A focus on “little data” might be better than “extravagant themes of the future.” He suggested not focusing on conditions for which there are no guidelines because that will result in uncomfortable debates between doctors, patients and the IT world. “It’s going to be much more difficult to change physician or patient behavior if the decisions are always discretionary.”

The Healthcare Leadership Forum was sponsored by Clinical Key and presented by Clinical Innovation + Technology.

Beth Walsh,

Editor

Editor Beth earned a bachelor’s degree in journalism and master’s in health communication. She has worked in hospital, academic and publishing settings over the past 20 years. Beth joined TriMed in 2005, as editor of CMIO and Clinical Innovation + Technology. When not covering all things related to health IT, she spends time with her husband and three children.

Around the web

The American College of Cardiology has shared its perspective on new CMS payment policies, highlighting revenue concerns while providing key details for cardiologists and other cardiology professionals. 

As debate simmers over how best to regulate AI, experts continue to offer guidance on where to start, how to proceed and what to emphasize. A new resource models its recommendations on what its authors call the “SETO Loop.”

FDA Commissioner Robert Califf, MD, said the clinical community needs to combat health misinformation at a grassroots level. He warned that patients are immersed in a "sea of misinformation without a compass."

Trimed Popup
Trimed Popup