Healthcare consolidation deserves stronger antitrust examination

More consolidation across the healthcare sector is on the horizon thanks in part to the COVID-19 pandemic, according to an opinion by Commonwealth Fund leaders published in Harvard Business Review.

The consolidation trend has been ongoing for the last 20 years, but the pandemic may be adding fuel to fire, wrote Lovissa Gustafsson, assistant vice president at the Commonwealth Fund, and David Blumenthal, president of the organization. And the acceleration of the market consolidation should be concerning, as consolidation often leads to higher prices and a failure to improve quality of care. 

While the Federal Trade Commission has attempted some oversight, recently issuing orders to six of the biggest insurers in the U.S. for claims information, antitrust enforcement isn’t necessarily to follow. Further, smaller transactions that still change the competition landscape, such as physician practices being gobbled up, aren’t being closely scrutinized. The agency also previously promised to deeply examine the issue of hospital consolidation in 2019.

“That’s because the majority of individual transactions are too small to require federal reporting even though the acquisition of several smaller provider organizations can collectively lead to significant market concentration that seriously weakens the level of competition,” the authors wrote.

Plus, studying the impact of these consolidations across healthcare providers and specialties is nearly impossible due lack of transparency and data. However, Congress and the FTC could subpoena more information to evaluate and mitigate the anti-competition effects of healthcare consolidation.

Gustafsson and Blumenthal listed a number of steps for the two entities to take, including:

  • Evaluating the integrated payer and provider model
  • Evaluating the effect of M&A across the pharmacy specialty, including pharmacy benefit managers, retail chains, administrative series and more on drug purchasing, distribution and pricing
  • Restricting or prohibiting anti competitive contract provisions
  • Requiring all M&A activities to be reported 
  • Expanding the FTC’s antitrust powers

“We know with near certainty that big systems and insurers will be going on a shopping spree for struggling providers after the pandemic subsides,” they wrote. “By taking action now, Congress and regulators can help prevent market distortions that could adversely affect the cost and quality of care.”

Amy Baxter

Amy joined TriMed Media as a Senior Writer for HealthExec after covering home care for three years. When not writing about all things healthcare, she fulfills her lifelong dream of becoming a pirate by sailing in regattas and enjoying rum. Fun fact: she sailed 333 miles across Lake Michigan in the Chicago Yacht Club "Race to Mackinac."

Around the web

Compensation for heart specialists continues to climb. What does this say about cardiology as a whole? Could private equity's rising influence bring about change? We spoke to MedAxiom CEO Jerry Blackwell, MD, MBA, a veteran cardiologist himself, to learn more.

The American College of Cardiology has shared its perspective on new CMS payment policies, highlighting revenue concerns while providing key details for cardiologists and other cardiology professionals. 

As debate simmers over how best to regulate AI, experts continue to offer guidance on where to start, how to proceed and what to emphasize. A new resource models its recommendations on what its authors call the “SETO Loop.”