EHRA opposes timeframe of 2015 certification criteria

The Electronic Health Record Association (EHRA) raised concerns about a proposed rule containing voluntary certification criteria for EHR systems in 2015, according to a letter sent to the Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT (ONC).

The certification criteria propose developing a way for non-Meaningful Use EHR systems to become certified; enhancing interoperability efforts; issuing new certification criteria on functionality for patient population filtering of clinical quality measures; and improving alignment with other HHS programs and recommendations from the Office of Inspector General.

The proposed rule would allow ONC to more frequently update certification criteria to reflect new standards and to offer regulatory clarity.

In the letter, EHRA responded specifically to two parts of the proposed rule--frequency of certification and risks associated with enhanced clinical quality measures.

"Knowing that final specifications, test scripts and tools likely will not be available until months after the final rule comes out, we and our customers actually have even less time for all this work," the letter reads. In addition, the group called the 2015 edition implementation schedule an "unrealistic timeframe."

EHRA proposed re-naming the current certification criteria the "2016 Edition ... to provide some semblance of reality in terms of expectations by other federal agencies and EHR users as to when some of the final proposed functionality might be implemented."

"More frequent certification is not desirable and would be costly," the association notes.

EHRA also asked ONC "to consider a more incremental approach to the eventual implementation and adoption of these standards, ensuring that each one has been fully tested and piloted prior to requiring adoption by all EHRs."

 

Beth Walsh,

Editor

Editor Beth earned a bachelor’s degree in journalism and master’s in health communication. She has worked in hospital, academic and publishing settings over the past 20 years. Beth joined TriMed in 2005, as editor of CMIO and Clinical Innovation + Technology. When not covering all things related to health IT, she spends time with her husband and three children.

Around the web

Compensation for heart specialists continues to climb. What does this say about cardiology as a whole? Could private equity's rising influence bring about change? We spoke to MedAxiom CEO Jerry Blackwell, MD, MBA, a veteran cardiologist himself, to learn more.

The American College of Cardiology has shared its perspective on new CMS payment policies, highlighting revenue concerns while providing key details for cardiologists and other cardiology professionals. 

As debate simmers over how best to regulate AI, experts continue to offer guidance on where to start, how to proceed and what to emphasize. A new resource models its recommendations on what its authors call the “SETO Loop.”