Calif. grand jury details EHR implementation problems

A California county's EHR implementation resulted in inefficient and delayed patient care as the organization did not devote adequate resources to its rollout, a county grand jury report concluded.

Ventura County Health Care Agency (VCHCA) went live in July 2013 at two hospitals and 40 clinics in the county. In its investigation, the grand jury learned that the EHR vendor for the project had recognized that VCHCA’s system had insufficient sources to carry out the implementation. For example, VCHCA had inefficient ordering of hardwire required for the project; insufficient support staff; insufficient training on the new system; lacked an experienced project manager; and failed to develop a standard project plan for the implementation.

Moving forward, the grand jury recommended that Ventura County develop better processes for capital projects.

Following the release of the report, VCHCA Director Barry Fisher said that the situation is much different today, as many improvement have been made. “Where we are at today is night and day from where we started,” he told the Ventura County Star.

Read the full report here.

Around the web

Compensation for heart specialists continues to climb. What does this say about cardiology as a whole? Could private equity's rising influence bring about change? We spoke to MedAxiom CEO Jerry Blackwell, MD, MBA, a veteran cardiologist himself, to learn more.

The American College of Cardiology has shared its perspective on new CMS payment policies, highlighting revenue concerns while providing key details for cardiologists and other cardiology professionals. 

As debate simmers over how best to regulate AI, experts continue to offer guidance on where to start, how to proceed and what to emphasize. A new resource models its recommendations on what its authors call the “SETO Loop.”