NIST framework: Assessing an organization’s cybersecurity readiness

The National Institute of Standards and Technology’s (NIST's) voluntary framework for reducing cyber risks to critical infrastructure, released earlier this year, can assist providers in achieving their security goals, according to panelists at the National Institute of Standards and Technology and the Office of Civil Rights’ joint conference, “Safeguarding Health Information: Building Assurance through HIPAA Security,” on Sept. 23.  

The framework offers the following, according to Kevin Stine, manager of security outreach & integration at NIST:

  1. A set of standards, methodologies, processes and procedures that align policy, businesses and technological approaches to address cyber risks.
  2. A prioritized, flexible, repeatable, performance-based and cost-effective approach including information security measures and controls to help owners and operators of critical infrastructure identify, assess and manage cyber risks.
  3. Areas for improvement to be addressed through future collaboration with particular sectors and standards developing organizations.

The framework is flexible for organizations of all sizes. “It had to be broad enough to be responsible to the diversity of needs out there,” Stine said.

Only 8 percent of data breaches involve hacking incidents involving 500 or more patients, but the Department of Health & Human Services “is seeing those rise,” said Linda Sanches, health information privacy senior advisor at the Office of Civil Rights.   

In the future, “we expect greater now that we’ve had [the incident at] Community Health Systems, she said.

Of the 59 providers involved in breaches, she said 58 had at least one security rule finding or observation and two-thirds had no complete or accurate risk assessment. “Most covered entities have not identified key vulnerabilities,” she said.

Sanches encourages providers to utilize the framework to identify weaknesses around infrastructure and learn the essentials of response activities. “It emphasizes the critical nature of having response and recovery capabilities in place so when you are faced with threats, you have the ability to respond to that accordingly,” she said. Also, it outlines five security functions, mapped to activities, to help bolster security.

Also, the framework helps organizations provide a ranking system so organizations can understand what tier they are on according to their security practices and environment. “Entities can look where they are on at spectrum,” she said. Also, it helps organizations plan for where they want to be in the future.

Privacy and security are one of the five building blocks of the Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT’s interoperability vision paper, said Julie Chua, information security specialist in the Office of the Chief Privacy Officer.

The agency is working on technical assistance and user education on protecting health information. “The framework fits that exactly.” Also, ONC offers best practices, tips and guidelines—as well as training video games—to help organizations improve their security practices and cybersecurity awareness, she said.

Around the web

Compensation for heart specialists continues to climb. What does this say about cardiology as a whole? Could private equity's rising influence bring about change? We spoke to MedAxiom CEO Jerry Blackwell, MD, MBA, a veteran cardiologist himself, to learn more.

The American College of Cardiology has shared its perspective on new CMS payment policies, highlighting revenue concerns while providing key details for cardiologists and other cardiology professionals. 

As debate simmers over how best to regulate AI, experts continue to offer guidance on where to start, how to proceed and what to emphasize. A new resource models its recommendations on what its authors call the “SETO Loop.”