22 percent of ED visits result in ‘surprise’ out-of-network charges

Patients who went to an in-network emergency department (ED) were treated by an out-of-network physician 22 percent of the time, resulting in hundreds of thousands of dollars in unexpected medical bills.

The study, published by the New England Journal of Medicine, examined 2.2 million ED visits across the U.S. for patients under the age of 65. While nearly all—99.35 percent—of the visits were to in-network EDs, 22 percent of the visits involved an out-of-network physician.

Study authors Zack Cooper, PhD, and Fiona Scott Morton, PhD, both Yale University economists, said the use of “emergency packages” within insurance plans allows for these surprise charges and “prevents health care markets from functioning as they should.”

“Because patients don’t have a choice of emergency physicians and cannot avoid out-of-network doctors at in-network facilities, emergency physicians will get the same amount of business regardless of their prices or their participation in insurance networks,” they wrote. “As a result, absent intervention, emergency physicians can sidestep the price competition that other physicians face when treating privately insured patients.”

Cooper and Morton noted there was significant geographic variation in out-of-network billing rates. In McAllen, Texas, for example, the rate was 89 percent, which isn’t surprising considering an earlier study said among the hospitals included in the networks of the three largest payers in Texas, 21 to 56 percent had no in-network emergency physicians.

Other areas, including Boulder, Colorado, and South Bend, Indiana, had surprise billing rates close to zero. To Cooper and Morton, those differences mean this is an avoidable problem.

“Ultimately, surprise out-of-network billing is the result of a market failure: the lack of a competitively set price for physician services. There are various ways such a price could be established,” they wrote. We believe the best solution would be for states to require hospitals to sell a bundled ED care package that includes both facility and professional fees.”

Such a system would mean a hospital would negotiate prices for physician services with insurers, applying those rates for designated specialties. The hospital would then act as the buyer of physician services and seller of the combined physician and facility services. If the hospital’s negotiated rates were considered too low by a physicians, their only option would be choosing to work at another hospital.  

""
John Gregory, Senior Writer

John joined TriMed in 2016, focusing on healthcare policy and regulation. After graduating from Columbia College Chicago, he worked at FM News Chicago and Rivet News Radio, and worked on the state government and politics beat for the Illinois Radio Network. Outside of work, you may find him adding to his never-ending graphic novel collection.

Around the web

The American College of Cardiology has shared its perspective on new CMS payment policies, highlighting revenue concerns while providing key details for cardiologists and other cardiology professionals. 

As debate simmers over how best to regulate AI, experts continue to offer guidance on where to start, how to proceed and what to emphasize. A new resource models its recommendations on what its authors call the “SETO Loop.”

FDA Commissioner Robert Califf, MD, said the clinical community needs to combat health misinformation at a grassroots level. He warned that patients are immersed in a "sea of misinformation without a compass."

Trimed Popup
Trimed Popup