Evidence of COVID-19 surfaced here much sooner than thought

A new study has revealed that COVID-19 was likely already spreading in the U.S. much earlier than previously reported. In fact, the study adds to the CDC’s study suggesting the virus was present here as early as December 2019.

That’s according to researchers who examined antibodies in a study called “All of Us” and published their findings in Clinical Infectious Diseases. The study looked at 24,000 blood samples from participants across all 50 states between Jan. 2 and March 18, 2020.

Researchers found COVID-19 positive cases outside the known hotspots in the U.S. at the time, such as Seattle and New York City, which were believed to be prime entry points. Positive cases were found as early as January 7 in Illinois, Massachusetts, Mississippi, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. In many instances, the positive samples were acquired before the first cases were reported.

"This study allows us to uncover more information about the beginning of the U.S. epidemic and highlights the real-world value of longitudinal research in understanding dynamics of emerging diseases like COVID-19," Josh Denny, MD, MS, chief executive officer of All of Us and an author of the study, said in a statement. "Our participants come from diverse communities across the U.S. and give generously of themselves to drive a wide range of biomedical discoveries, which are vital for informing public health strategies and preparedness."

Researchers were concerned about false positives, which could have skewed their understanding of how and when the virus spread in the U.S. To qualify as a positive case, samples had to test positive for two teststhe Abbott Architect SARS-CoV-2 IgG ELISA and the EUROIMMUN SARS-CoV-2 ELISA (IgG) platforms. Both tests were approved by the FDA under emergency authorization.

The early detection of antibodies in the samples suggest that people in the U.S. had been exposed to the virus weeks earlier.

"Antibody testing of blood samples helps us better understand the spread of SARS-CoV-2 in the U.S. in the early days of the U.S. epidemic, when testing was restricted and public health officials could not see that the virus had already spread outside of recognized initial points of entry," said Keri N. Althoff, PhD, lead author and associate professor of epidemiology at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore. "This study also demonstrates the importance of using multiple serology platforms, as recommended by the CDC."

Study authors noted several limitations to their study, including the low number of samples from some states. Additionally, it is unknown where people got infected and therefore developed antibodies to the virus, either in their own communities or while traveling. 

 

Amy Baxter

Amy joined TriMed Media as a Senior Writer for HealthExec after covering home care for three years. When not writing about all things healthcare, she fulfills her lifelong dream of becoming a pirate by sailing in regattas and enjoying rum. Fun fact: she sailed 333 miles across Lake Michigan in the Chicago Yacht Club "Race to Mackinac."

Around the web

The American College of Cardiology has shared its perspective on new CMS payment policies, highlighting revenue concerns while providing key details for cardiologists and other cardiology professionals. 

As debate simmers over how best to regulate AI, experts continue to offer guidance on where to start, how to proceed and what to emphasize. A new resource models its recommendations on what its authors call the “SETO Loop.”

FDA Commissioner Robert Califf, MD, said the clinical community needs to combat health misinformation at a grassroots level. He warned that patients are immersed in a "sea of misinformation without a compass."

Trimed Popup
Trimed Popup