Humans Keeping Machines in Check

Mark Michalski, MD, Executive Director of the MGH/BWH Center for Clinical Data Science gets to see, touch or hear about much of what’s happening in artificial intelligence.

“Nearly all the machine learning algorithms that are being assessed, developed or even conceptualized are for radiologist augmentation as opposed to replacement,” he says, offering as examples algorithms that not only prioritize worklists and flag anatomical abnormalities but also calculate probability metrics for critical findings.

“As powerful as these tools are, they still must be checked by a human to get to the levels of confidence that we need,” he says. “That may not always be the case, but it is the case today. Radiologists will be guiding the development of these tools for the foreseeable future, and these tools are not for final diagnosis.”

Who else is engaged in AI? Pathology, radiation oncology, cardiology and neurology, he notes. “In fact, every ‘-ology’ is having this same discussion. It just so happens that radiology is once again at the forefront of a technology revolution.” 

Around the web

The American College of Cardiology has shared its perspective on new CMS payment policies, highlighting revenue concerns while providing key details for cardiologists and other cardiology professionals. 

As debate simmers over how best to regulate AI, experts continue to offer guidance on where to start, how to proceed and what to emphasize. A new resource models its recommendations on what its authors call the “SETO Loop.”

FDA Commissioner Robert Califf, MD, said the clinical community needs to combat health misinformation at a grassroots level. He warned that patients are immersed in a "sea of misinformation without a compass."