How nursing homes may be gaming Medicare star ratings

A five-star rating on CMS’s Nursing Home Compare website may not equate to “five-star service,” according to a Florida Atlantic University (FAU) study that found nursing homes’ scores may be artificially inflated.

The study, published in Production and Operations Management, examined data from more than 1,200 nursing homes in California for the first five years of the star ratings, beginning in 2008.

That rating is partially based on self-reported data about quality measures and staffing practices, such as how many hours registered nurses work per resident day. What FAU professor Xu Han and his coauthors found was little correlation between self-reported results and those collected by health inspectors. For example, the number of complaints received from residents was similar between nursing homes which were given similar scores on health inspections.

When comparing facilities which received the same overall star rating, however, the number of resident complaints varied significantly, suggesting nursing homes inflate their self-reported measures to mask poorer scores on inspections they don’t control.

“We were able to empirically demonstrate that inflation does exist in the current system," Han said in a press release. “So many nursing homes have a five-star rating; they look like they're luxury hotels, but it's difficult to see through that and determine what kind of service they're actually providing.”

Little direct correlation was founded between the self-reported measures and results from inspections “either contemporaneously or over time.” Han and his coauthors concluded that between 6 percent and 8.5 percent of facilities inflated their self-reported quality or patient staffing measures.

In the most recent U.S. News and World Report nursing home rankings, 15 percent of all facilities (2,285 total) that were evaluated achieved at least a 4.5 star rating on a 5-star scale. Those rankings were based on data from the CMS Nursing Home Compare site, while also factored in two additional quality measures.

""
John Gregory, Senior Writer

John joined TriMed in 2016, focusing on healthcare policy and regulation. After graduating from Columbia College Chicago, he worked at FM News Chicago and Rivet News Radio, and worked on the state government and politics beat for the Illinois Radio Network. Outside of work, you may find him adding to his never-ending graphic novel collection.

Around the web

The American College of Cardiology has shared its perspective on new CMS payment policies, highlighting revenue concerns while providing key details for cardiologists and other cardiology professionals. 

As debate simmers over how best to regulate AI, experts continue to offer guidance on where to start, how to proceed and what to emphasize. A new resource models its recommendations on what its authors call the “SETO Loop.”

FDA Commissioner Robert Califf, MD, said the clinical community needs to combat health misinformation at a grassroots level. He warned that patients are immersed in a "sea of misinformation without a compass."

Trimed Popup
Trimed Popup