267,000 healthcare jobs would be eliminated under latest ACA repeal plan

The Graham-Cassidy legislation to repeal the Affordable Care Act (ACA) would cause an immediate downturn in healthcare employment, amounting to more than 267,000 fewer jobs in the industry by 2026, according to a report from George Washington University’s Milken Institute School of Public Health and the Commonwealth Fund.

Estimated job losses were less severe than previous ACA repeal bills. The House-passed American Health Care Act was projected to eliminate 725,000 healthcare jobs while the Senate’s Better Care Reconciliation Act would have reduced healthcare employment by 919,000 jobs.

Under Graham-Cassidy, healthcare employment would drop immediately, according to the study, declining by 47,000 jobs in 2018. The

“In 2020, funding for the Medicaid expansion and subsidies for health insurance marketplaces ends and is replaced with the smaller block grants. As federal funding losses deepen over time, revenues paid to hospitals, clinics, and health providers would decline. This in turn would lead to more healthcare employment declines and losses in other sectors like construction, retail, and finance,” wrote Leighton Ku, PhD, director of the Center for Health Policy Research at the Milken Institute and his coauthors.

By 2026, states which hadn’t expanded Medicaid would actually see a slight gain in healthcare employment of 9,500 jobs. This is because of the bill reallocating funding from the Medicaid expansion states to nonexpansion states. Texas, for example, would gain an estimated 13,833 jobs by 2026, while California would lose 43,490.

A separate report from S&P Global Ratings estimated high job losses in the overall economy under Graham-Cassidy, with employment declining by 580,000 jobs, compared to the Commonwealth Fund’ estimate of 345,000 jobs lost in the U.S. The S&P report didn’t quantify the healthcare sector’s losses, but said providers will be hit hard by the reduced funding under the bill’s proposed block grants.

“While most industries were shedding workers during the Great Recession, healthcare saw steady gains—and the sector continues to grow by leaps and bounds as aging Baby Boomers add to demand,” the S&P report said. “But one can't ignore the effects that hundreds of billions of dollars from Uncle Sam have had on the sector. In short, if the federal government turns off the faucet, it's not hard to imagine that business will dry up for a number of healthcare providers. And with less business, there would be less need to hire more workers--or even keep the ones they've got.”

The Graham-Cassidy legislation has been tabled for now by Senate Republicans, with cosponsor Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-South Carolina, promising, "We're coming back to this."

""
John Gregory, Senior Writer

John joined TriMed in 2016, focusing on healthcare policy and regulation. After graduating from Columbia College Chicago, he worked at FM News Chicago and Rivet News Radio, and worked on the state government and politics beat for the Illinois Radio Network. Outside of work, you may find him adding to his never-ending graphic novel collection.

Around the web

Compensation for heart specialists continues to climb. What does this say about cardiology as a whole? Could private equity's rising influence bring about change? We spoke to MedAxiom CEO Jerry Blackwell, MD, MBA, a veteran cardiologist himself, to learn more.

The American College of Cardiology has shared its perspective on new CMS payment policies, highlighting revenue concerns while providing key details for cardiologists and other cardiology professionals. 

As debate simmers over how best to regulate AI, experts continue to offer guidance on where to start, how to proceed and what to emphasize. A new resource models its recommendations on what its authors call the “SETO Loop.”