'Tele-abortions' just as safe as in-person consultations

Tele-abortions are just as safe as in-person care, according to a study published in Obstetrics & Gynecology, which compared the rates of adverse effects of medical abortions during telehealth procedures to those conducted at an in-person to evaluate safety rates.

The study included data on adverse events such as hospital admission, surgery, blood transfusion and death for all telehealth-performed medical abortions and those from an in-person clinic in Iowa, examining data from July 2008 to 2015.

Overall, 8,765 telemedicine and 10,405 in-person medical abortions were performed. With a total of 49 incidents, adverse events were reported in 0.18 percent of telemedicine patients and in 0.32 percent of in-person patients

“Adverse events are rare with medical abortion, and telemedicine provision is noninferior to in-person provision with regard to clinically significant adverse events,” concluded first author Daniel Grossman, MD, and colleagues.

The report also included a survey of 119 emergency departments in Iowa, asking if the clinic had treated a woman with an adverse event in the previous year. A total of 42 clinics responded,; none reported treating a woman with an adverse event after a medical abortion.

""
Cara Livernois, News Writer

Cara joined TriMed Media in 2016 and is currently a Senior Writer for Clinical Innovation & Technology. Originating from Detroit, Michigan, she holds a Bachelors in Health Communications from Grand Valley State University.

Around the web

Compensation for heart specialists continues to climb. What does this say about cardiology as a whole? Could private equity's rising influence bring about change? We spoke to MedAxiom CEO Jerry Blackwell, MD, MBA, a veteran cardiologist himself, to learn more.

The American College of Cardiology has shared its perspective on new CMS payment policies, highlighting revenue concerns while providing key details for cardiologists and other cardiology professionals. 

As debate simmers over how best to regulate AI, experts continue to offer guidance on where to start, how to proceed and what to emphasize. A new resource models its recommendations on what its authors call the “SETO Loop.”