Cyberattacks on 3D printers result in defective products

Cyberattacks occur on many types of devices—including 3D printers. A new study, conducted by researchers at Rutgers University-New Brunswick and Georgia Institute of Technology, examines methods in protecting 3D printers for improved cybersecurity.

The study, which was presented at the 26th USENIX Security Symposium, reviewed methods professionals can take in protecting 3D printers and preventing cyberattacks from corrupting devices.

"They will be attractive targets because 3D-printed objects and parts are used in critical infrastructures around the world, and cyberattacks may cause failures in healthcare, transportation, robotics, aviation and space," said Saman Aliari Zonouz, an associate professor at Rutgers University-New Brunswick.

Currently, 3D-printed health- and safety-related devices are produced without standards for accuracy. This leads to many organizations sending software-designed products to be printed in outside facilities, increasing susceptibility to hackers. The study had researchers purchase different 3D printers to show how hacking into the firmware can lead to defective objects.

"Imagine outsourcing the manufacturing of an object to a 3D printing facility and you have no access to their printers and no way of verifying whether small defects, invisible to the naked eye, have been inserted into your object," said Mehdi Javanmard, study co-author and assistant professor at Rutgers University-New Brunswick. "The results could be devastating, and you would have no way of tracing where the problem came from."

""
Cara Livernois, News Writer

Cara joined TriMed Media in 2016 and is currently a Senior Writer for Clinical Innovation & Technology. Originating from Detroit, Michigan, she holds a Bachelors in Health Communications from Grand Valley State University.

Around the web

The American College of Cardiology has shared its perspective on new CMS payment policies, highlighting revenue concerns while providing key details for cardiologists and other cardiology professionals. 

As debate simmers over how best to regulate AI, experts continue to offer guidance on where to start, how to proceed and what to emphasize. A new resource models its recommendations on what its authors call the “SETO Loop.”

FDA Commissioner Robert Califf, MD, said the clinical community needs to combat health misinformation at a grassroots level. He warned that patients are immersed in a "sea of misinformation without a compass."

Trimed Popup
Trimed Popup